Bruce C. Webster, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 7, 2009
0120091255 (E.E.O.C. May. 7, 2009)

0120091255

05-07-2009

Bruce C. Webster, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Bruce C. Webster,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120091255

Agency No. 1A102006708

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated December 12, 2008, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim. In a complaint dated November 30, 2008, complainant

alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal

for prior protected EEO activity when:

1. On August 25, 2008, complainant's request for Family Medical Leave Act

(FMLA) protection for his leave was denied;

2. On September 8, 2008, he was denied a copy of the Independent Medical

Examiners report; and

3. On September 15, 2008, complainant was subjected to unspecified

harassment.

The Commission finds that with respect to complainant's FMLA rights,

the complaint fails to state a claim under the EEOC Regulations. The

Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint process

to lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding. The Commission

further finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the EEOC

regulations because complainant failed to show that he suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Specifically, the record

indicates that complainant's request for FMLA protection was denied,

however, complainant was permitted to take leave for the time period

he requested. Complainant takes issue with the fact that his leave

was not approved under the protection of the FMLA The proper forum for

complainant to have raised his challenges is with the Department of Labor.

It is inappropriate now to attempt to use the EEO process to collaterally

attack the agency's action. Moreover, with respect to claim 2 regarding

the agency's denial of the Independent Medical Examiners report, we find

that complainant has failed to state a claim regarding an injury to a

term, condition or privilege of his employment.

Turning now to claim 3 regarding complainant's harassment claim, the

Commission finds that complainant has failed to demonstrate that agency

conduct affected the terms and conditions of his employment. In that

regard, we find that the agency's decision dismissing claim 3 because

it failed to state a claim was proper. Accordingly, the agency's final

decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__________________

Date

May 7, 2009

2

0120091255

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120091255