Broadway Iron and Pipe Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMay 27, 194983 N.L.R.B. 942 (N.L.R.B. 1949) Copy Citation In the Matter of BROADWAY IRON AND PIPE CORPORATION , EMPLOYER and TRUCK DRIVERS AND CHAUFFEURS UNION, LOCAL 807, INTERNA- TIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS , CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS, AFL, PETITIONER Case No. 20-RC-934.-Decided May 27,1949 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held before D. J. Sullivan, hearing officer of the National Labor Relations Board. The hearing officer 's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman Herzog and Members Houston and Murdock]. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds: 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. The labor organizations named below claim to represent em- ployees of the Employer. 3. The question concerning representation : The Employer and the Intervenor, Local 1146, Retail Clerks Inter- national Association, AFL, have maintained contractual relations since 1946. Their contract dated January 1, 1948, provided for expira- tion on January 1, 1949, and had a 30-day automatic renewal provision. Within a week after November 29,1948,1- the Employer and the Inter- venor executed a 1-year contract to become effective January 1, 1949. On December 3, 1948, the Intervenor won a union authorization elec- tion. On December 7,1948, the instant petition was filed. The Inter- venor and the Employer claim that the contract executed on or about ' None of the parties recalled the prQcise date on which the new contract was signed by the Intervenor . In view of our finding below that the contract does not constitute a bar because it contains unlawful security provisions , it is unnecessary to determine whether or not it was also prematurely extended. 83 N. L . R. B., No. 136. 942 BROADWAY IRON AND PIPE CORPORATION 943 November 29, is a bar to a present determination of representatives, and moved to dismiss the petition on that ground. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is denied. Clauses 3 and 4 of the agreement read as follows: 3. All steady and/or extra employees shall be obtained from the office of the union. In the event that the union shall not be able to supply any employee, then the employer may attempt to obtain employees from any source whatsoever and shall notify in writing, the union, that he, it or them have hired such new employees, within 48 hours from the time of the commencement of the new employment. It shall be the duty of the employer to see that any new employees shall become a member of the union within two weeks from the date of the commencement of his employment. 4. In employing members of the union, the employer agrees to require of such members a Work Permit or Dues Book signed by an authorized representative or officer of the union before employing same. In employing persons who are not in the union, a Work Permit must be secured from the union, duly signed before com- mencing their employment. These clauses require the Employer (1) to hire only Intervenor members whenever they are available; (2) to hire them through the Intervenor ; (3) when Intervenor members are not available, to hire only individuals who are acceptable to the Intervenor; (4) to require these individuals to obtain Intervenor work permits before com- mencing their employment; and (5) to compel them to become mem- bers of the Intervenor within 2 weeks after they are hired. Such requirements go beyond the limited degree of union security permitted under Section 8 (a) (3) of the Act,2 and also beyond the authorization of the union-shop election held pursuant to Section 9 (e) (1) of the Act. Because of these requirements, the contract is violative of the Act, and cannot therefore serve as a bar to a current determination of representatives.3 Accordingly, we find that a question affecting commerce exists concerning the representation of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 4. The appropriate unit : All parties agree that a unit of the Employer's truck drivers and their helpers, excluding all other employees, is appropriate. The Petitioner, however, wishes to exclude from this unit two sons of Hyman Schreer, the Employer's president, who are employed as 2Matter of National Maritime Union of America, 78 N. L. R. B 971. Matter of American Export Lines, 81 N. L. R. B. 1370 ; See also Matter of C. Hager 4 Sons Hinge Manufacturing Company , 80 N. L. R. B. 163. 944 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD truck drivers, whereas the Intervenor and the Employer wish to include them. As these two individuals exercise some supervisory authority,4 and as one of them now is, and the other has been, a vice president of the Employer, their interests seem to be more closely allied with those of management than with those of the employees. In view of this fact, and of our policy to exclude close relatives of management from the appropriate unit,5 we shall exclude the sons of the Employer's president, Hyman Schreer, from the appropriate unit. Accordingly, we find that all truck drivers and their helpers employed at the Employer's Brooklyn, New York, plant, excluding office clerical employees, the sons of President Hyman Schreer, guards, professional employees, and supervisors within the meaning of the Act, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with the Employer, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted, as early as possible, but not later than 30 days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Region in which this case was heard, and subject to Sections 203.61 and 203.62 of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 5, as amended, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in paragraph numbered 4, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction of Election, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation of temporarily laid off, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, and also excluding employees on strike who are not entitled to reinstatement, to deter- mine whether they desire to be represented, for purposes of collective bargaining, by Truck Drivers and Chauffeurs Union, Local 807, Inter- national Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers, AFL, or by Local 1146, Retail Clerks International Associa- tion, AFL, or by neither. 4 It is not clear from the record whether or not these individuals are supervisors within the meaning of the Act. 5 Matter of Alabama Brick t Tile Company , 80 N. L. R. B. 1365 ; Matter of Associated Electronic Enterprises, Inc., 80 N . L. R. B. 295. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation