Bricklayers' & Stone Masons' UnionDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsOct 28, 1971193 N.L.R.B. 1002 (N.L.R.B. 1971) Copy Citation 1002 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Bricklayers' & Stone Masons' Union, Local No. 8 Bricklayers , Masons & Plasterers ' International Union of America , AFL-CIO and Western Mono- lithics Concrete Products, Inc., d/b/a California Concrete Systems and Joseph J. Bartaldo, sole proprieter, d/b/a West Valley Masonry Company, Party to the Contract. Cases 20-CC-818 and 20-CE-58 October 28, 1971 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND AMENDED ORDER BY CHAIRMAN MILLER AND MEMBERS FANNING, JENKINS, AND KENNEDY On December 12, 1969, the National Labor Rela- tions Board issued a Decision and Order in the above- entitled proceeding,' finding, inter alia, that Respon- dent did not violate Section 8(b)(4)(B) by threatening to picket Besco . In the Board's view, Besco was the primary employer and thus subject to picketing by the Union. Accordingly, the Board dismissed the com- plaint insofar as it alleged a violation of Section 8(b)(4)(B) with regard to Besco. Subsequently, the Charging Party, California Concrete Systems, filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit a petition to review the part of the Board's Order which dismissed the complaint with regard to Besco. t 180 NLRB No 3 s Western Monolithics Concrete Products, Inc, d/b/a California Concrete Thereafter, on July 21, 1971, the court handed down its decision in which it granted the petition to review and set aside the Board's dismissal of the complaint with respect to the Union's threat to picket Besco on the ground that, in threatening to picket Besco, the Union unlawfully extended the controversy to a protected neutral employer.2 The Board, having accepted the court's decision for the purposes of this proceeding, hereby enters an amended order with respect to the threat to picket Besco. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Board's Order in this proceeding be, and it hereby is, amended, by adding the following as paragraph 1(c) of the Order: Threatening, coercing, or restraining Besco, or any other person engaged in commerce, where an object thereof is to force or require said Company or any other person to cease using, selling, handling, or dealing in the products of, or to cease doing business with, California Concrete Systems. Add the following as the third indented paragraph in the notice attached as an appendix to the original Order: WE WILL NOT threaten, coerce, or restrain Besco, or any other person engaged in commerce, where an object thereof is to force or require said Company or any other person to cease using, selling, handling, or dealing in the products of, or to cease doing business with, California Concrete Systems. Systems v N L R B, 446 F.2d 522 (C A. 9, July 21, 1971) 193 NLRB No. 158 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation