01a02349
05-16-2000
Brian T. Kirchner, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Brian T. Kirchner v. United States Postal Service
01A02349
May 16, 2000
Brian T. Kirchner, )
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01A02349
) Agency No. 1-J-482-0028-99
William J. Henderson, )
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
Agency. )
)
DECISION
The complainant timely filed an appeal with this Commission from a final
agency action, dated December 30, 1999, which the agency issued pursuant
to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107.<1> The Commission accepts the complainant's
appeal pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified
at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405).
After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration
of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission to REVERSE the final agency action.
The agency dismissed the complaint for failure to prosecute on the ground
that the complainant had failed to respond to three requests to define
the issue raised in his complaint. The record demonstrates that the
agency had sufficient information in the EEO Counselor's Report to define
the issue raised in the April 7, 1999 complaint. The Report indicates
that the complainant alleged discrimination on the basis of physical
disability (type 1 diabetes) when, on January 18, 1999, he was called
into his supervisor's office and told he could no longer attend to his
diabetic needs (testing blood, injecting insulin) while on the clock.
The Commission finds that the agency did not require any additional
information to define the issue raised in the complaint, that is, the
alleged failure of the agency to provide a reasonable accommodation for
the complainant's disability. For this reason, the Commission reverses
the final agency action.
The Commission also observes that the agency's request letters did not
request that the complainant define the issue raised in his complaint.
Rather, they requested that he provide an affidavit responding to every
question and every subpart of every question listed on three pages of
small type face. The agency's second and third requests informed the
complainant that he would have a reasonable amount of official time to
prepare his response.
According to an acting supervisor's affidavit, the complainant requested,
and the acting supervisor authorized, only 45 minutes to an hour of
official time to meet with his representative in mid or late November
1999. In contrast, on appeal the complainant contends that the agency
denied his repeated requests for official time to respond to the agency's
requests. The record does not indicate whether the agency required the
complainant to request official time from his supervisor or from the
EEO Office. Without such information, the Commission cannot conclude
that the complainant failed to request official time to respond to the
agency's request for a detailed affidavit.
On remand, the agency should grant the complainant official time to meet
with his representative to respond to the agency's affidavit requests.
The agency may choose to determine the amount of official time it will
grant based on the amount of detailed information the complainant provides
in response to the questions. However, it appears that it would take
three hours or more to provide even minimal responses to the agency's
questions, plus additional time to have the affidavit notarized as a
written declaration made under oath or affirmation, and time to obtain
the requested medical evidence.
The complainant is advised that he should respond to the agency's requests
for information even if the agency denies him what he believes to be a
reasonable amount of official time for himself and his representative.
The agency shall include in the record copies of the complainant's written
requests for official time and the agency's written responses to each
of his requests, including an explanation for any denial of requested
official time. The complainant may challenge any denials of official
time when he requests a hearing before an Administrative Judge and in
an appeal to this Commission of a final agency action on his complaint.
ORDER (E0400)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claims in accordance with
64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108). The agency shall acknowledge to
the complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty
(30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency
shall issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall
notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty
(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the
matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant
requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a
final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action.
The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office
of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,
P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must
contain supporting documentation, and the agency must send a copy of
all submissions to the complainant. If the agency does not comply with
the Commission's order, the complainant may petition the Commission for
enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The complainant
also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with
the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition
for enforcement. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be
codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. ��1614.407, 1614.408),
and 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the
right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance
with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action."
29 C.F.R. ��1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or
a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline
stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant
files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint,
including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.409).
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must
also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0400)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN
THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
May 16, 2000
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that the
decision was mailed to the complainant, the complainant's representative,
and the agency on:
DATE Equal Employment Assistant
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.