Brenda Miller, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 12, 2000
01a02609 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 12, 2000)

01a02609

07-12-2000

Brenda Miller, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Brenda Miller v. United States Postal Service

01A02609

July 12, 2000

Brenda Miller, )

Complainant, )

) Appeal No. 01A02609

v. ) Agency No. 1-D-271-0069-99

)

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On February 12, 2000, complainant filed a timely appeal with this

Commission from the January 12, 2000 final agency decision dismissing

her EEO complaint of unlawful employment discrimination of Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et

seq, and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.<1> The Commission

accepts the appeal in accordance with 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)

(to be codified at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405).

Complainant contacted the EEO office on June 28, 1999, regarding claims

of discrimination based on sex, retaliation, and physical disability.

Informal efforts to resolve her concerns were unsuccessful. On August

12, 1999, complainant filed a formal complaint.

The agency framed the complainant's claims as follows:

On or about June 3, 1999, an agency Supervisor screamed at complainant

and ordered her to return to work after he sent her to the office and

to sign a form requesting light duty.

On or about June 21, 1999, an agency Supervisor stated that if

complainant did not request light duty, he would put complainant in

a non-pay status, which has caused complainant to experience anxiety

attacks, severe headaches and nausea.

On January 12, 2000, the agency issued a FAD, dismissing the claim

on the grounds that the matter was raised in a pending civil action

in U.S. District Court. Specifically, the agency indicated that in

approximately June 1999, complainant filed a civil action (identified as

Civil Action No. 1:99CV00541) in the United States District Court for the

Middle District of North Carolina. The agency determined that the claims

raised therein are the same as those raised in the instant complaint.

Volume 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(3)) provides that

the agency shall dismiss a complaint that is the basis for a pending

civil action in a United States District Court in which the complainant

is a party provided that 180 days have passed since the filing of the

administrative complaint, or that was the basis of a civil action decided

by a United States District Court in which complainant was a party.

The record contains a copy of the civil action cited by the agency

in its final decision. The civil action contains the same matters

which are the subject of the final complaint at issue in the instant

appeal. Complainant's complaint alleges that her Supervisor pressured her

into signing a light duty request form instead of following complainant's

doctor's orders to refrain from standing and threatened to put complainant

in non-pay status if she did not comply. Complainant's civil action

specifically states that complainant's Supervisor continues to insist on

her applying for light duty status and continues to harass and intimidate

her, in addition to threatening non-pay status for noncompliance.

The issues raised in the civil action are the same matters contained in

the formal complaint.

The Commission notes that the agency apparently dismissed the complaint

prior to the expiration of the 180-day period provided for in 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(3). However, in order to conserve resources and avoid the

potential for inconsistent or conflicting decisions, the Commission

affirms the agency's dismissal of the complainant's administrative

complaint. If the court dismisses the complainant's complaint for

premature filing, complainant may request that the Commission reinstate

this appeal for further processing. See Posey v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Appeal No. 01951777 (September 21, 1995).

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss complainant's complaint

is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

July 12, 2000

____________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.