01A22150_r
06-27-2002
Brenda Miller, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Brenda Miller v. United States Postal Service
01A22150
June 27, 2002
.
Brenda Miller,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A22150
Agency Nos. 1-D-271-0005-02 & 1-D-271-0008-02
DECISION
Upon review, the Commission finds that the captioned complaints were
properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure
to state a claim.
Agency Case No. 1-D-271-0005-02
Complainant claimed that she had been discriminated against on the basis
of race when on September 11, 2001, her manager insisted that she have her
picture taken at the e-desk in order to show her physician what she would
be required to do and where she would work. The EEO Counselor's Report
shows that after complainant refused to have her picture taken, another
coworker was asked to sit at the e-desk to take the picture in question.
Agency Case No. 1-D-271-0008-02
Complainant claimed that she had been discriminated against on the basis
of race when on October 23, 2001, a supervisor told her that she would be
required to sit at another seat at the wrap table. Complainant further
claimed that she knew no other employee that was required to give up
her seat so that another employee could work.
The agency dismissed both complaints on the grounds of failure to state
a claim after finding that complainant had failed to show that she had
been harmed by the incidents in question.
Regarding the subject complaints, we find that the complaint fails
to state a claim under 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 because this claim, even
if proven to be true, would not indicate that complainant has been
subjected to harassment that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to
alter the conditions of her employment. Moreover, the complaint does not
otherwise challenge an unlawful employment policy or practice. See Cobb
v. Department of the Treasury, Request No. 05970077 (March 13, 1997).
Accordingly, the agency's final decisions are hereby AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
June 27, 2002
Date