Brandon M. Keene, Complainant,v.Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 25, 2009
0520090212 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 25, 2009)

0520090212

02-25-2009

Brandon M. Keene, Complainant, v. Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Brandon M. Keene,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Donald C. Winter,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Request No. 0520090212

Appeal No. 0120083910

Agency No. 080017801471

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Brandon

M. Keene v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 0120083910 (December

22, 2008). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its

discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision

where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

(2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In his underlying complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to

unlawful discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq,. and Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., on the

bases of his race (Asian), disability (Bipolar Disorder), and in reprisal

for prior protected EEO activity when: (1) between October 17, 2006 and

December 18, 2006, he was subjected to a hostile work environment; and

(2) on or about December 18, 2006, he was coerced into resigning. In its

final decision, the agency dismissed complainant's complaint, pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact.

Specifically, the agency found that complainant knew or should have

known that he had been subjected to discrimination on March 22, 2007,

but complainant did not contact an EEO Counselor until April 24, 2008.

On appeal, the Commission affirmed the agency's dismissal of the instant

complaint.

In his request for reconsideration, complainant's representative argues

that complainant was not aware of his mental disability until November

2007, and therefore could not have suspected that he had been subjected to

unlawful disability discrimination until that time. We find, however,

that even assuming that argument to be true, complainant's April 24,

2008 EEO Counselor contact was still beyond the 45-day time limit

set out in the regulations. Accordingly, after reconsidering the

previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the

request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it

is the decision of the Commission to DENY the request. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 0120083910 remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the

request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as

stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 25, 2009

Date

2

0520090212

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0520090212