Black's Railroad Transit Service

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jun 20, 2001

334 N.L.R.B. 325 (N.L.R.B. 2001)

BLACKS RAILROAD TRANSIT SERVICE 325
Black’s Railroad Transit Service and Candice L.
Bowles and Richard Carroll. Cases 33–CA–13425
and 33–CA–13481
June 20, 2001
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN HURTGEN AND MEMBERS
LIEBMAN AND TRUESDALE
On a charge and a first amended charge filed by Can-
dice L. Bowles in Case 33–CA–13425 on September 5
and November 17, 2000, and a charge and a first amended
charge filed by Richard Carroll in Case 33–CA–13481 on
October 27 and December 19, 2000, the General Counsel
of the National Labor Relations Board issued a complaint
in Case 33–CA–13425 on November 30, 2000, against
Black’s Railroad Transit Service (the Respondent), and the
Acting General Counsel issued a complaint in Case 33–
CA–13481 against the Respondent on January 19, 2001.
The complaints allege that the Respondent has violated
Section 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations
Act (the Act). Although properly served copies of the
charges and complaints, the Respondent failed to file an
answer to either complaint. On April 3, 2001, the Acting
Regional Director for Region 33 issued an order consoli-
dating Cases 33–CA–13425 and 33–CA–13481.
On April 6, 2001, the Acting General Counsel filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment with the Board. On April
9, 2001, the Board issued an order transferring the pro-
ceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the
motion should not be granted. The Notice to Show Cause
stated that the Respondent’s response should be filed with
the Board, with affidavit of service on the parties, by April
23, 2001. No such response was received by the Board.
However, on April 30, 2001, the Office of the General
Counsel’s Division of Operations-Management in Wash-
ington, D.C., received an undated letter from the Respon-
dent stating: “Attention: The NLRB in Peoria should have
sent their files on to you, but here is everything we have
sent to them.” Attached to the letter were memoranda
setting forth answers to various questions relevant to the
allegations in the charges filed by the two individual
Charging Parties. Also attached were certain employment
records. The Division of Operations-Management for-
warded the letter and attached documents to the Board.
We decline to accept these documents in lieu of an an-
swer to the complaint on both procedural and substantive
grounds. Procedurally, we find that they were neither
timely filed nor properly served on counsel for the General
Counsel and the Charging Parties. Nowhere in the docu-
ments does the Respondent explain its failure to previously
file an answer to the complaint or to timely respond to the
Notice to Show Cause.
Substantively, we find that, even assuming we were to
accept the documents as timely filed and served, they do
not constitute a sufficient answer to the complaint allega-
tions.1 The memoranda and other documents attached to
the Respondent’s letter appear to be a copy of statements
of position submitted during the precomplaint investiga-
tion of the charges. There is nothing in those documents
indicating that they were filed in response to the subse-
quent complaint, or that they are intended to serve as an
answer to the complaint. Nor does the Respondent’s be-
lated letter forwarding those documents to the Division of
Operations-Management indicate that they are intended to
serve as the Respondent’s answer to the complaint. In
these circumstances, and notwithstanding the Board’s gen-
eral policy of showing some leniency to pro se litigants,
we decline to accept the letter and attached documents in
lieu of a formal answer. Cf. Mid-Wilshire Health Care
Center, 331 NLRB 1032 (2000); Electro-Flyte, Inc., 331
NLRB 633 (2000); and Central States Xpress, 324 NLRB
442, 443–444 (1997) (Board accepted pro se respondents’
postcharge, precomplaint statements of position in lieu of
a formal answer where the respondents had filed an infor-
mal response to the complaint which expressly incorpo-
rated the prior statement of position).
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
Sections 102.20 and 102.21 of the Board’s Rules and
Regulations provide that the allegations in the complaint
shall be deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within
14 days from service of the complaint, unless good cause
is shown. In addition, each of these complaints affirma-
tively notes that unless an answer is filed within 14 days of
service, all the allegations in the complaint will be consid-
ered admitted. Further, the undisputed allegations in the
Motion for Summary Judgment disclose that the Region,
by letter dated March 19, 2001, notified the Respondent
that unless an answer were received by March 26, 2001, a
Motion for Summary Judgment would be filed.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the failure
to file a timely answer, we grant the General Counsel’s
Motion for Summary Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, an Illinois corpo-
ration with an office and place of business in Galesburg,
Illinois, has been engaged in business as a transportation
service. During the 12-month periods ending December

1 Chairman Hurtgen does not agree with this finding.
334 NLRB No. 49
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 326
31, 1999, and December 31, 2000, the Respondent, in
conducting its business operations described above, per-
formed services in excess of $50,000 in States other than
the State of Illinois, and purchased and received at its
Galesburg, Illinois facility, goods valued in excess of
$50,000 directly from points outside the State of Illinois.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged in
commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and (7)
of the Act, and that Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers,
Local Union No. 627, International Brotherhood of Team-
sters (the Union) is a labor organization within the mean-
ing of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, Richard Black held the position of
the Respondent’s owner and president, and has been a
supervisor of the Respondent within the meaning of Sec-
tion 2(11) of the Act and an agent of the Respondent
within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the Act.
At all material times, Glenda Black was the sister of
Richard Black, and has been a supervisor of the Respon-
dent within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act and/or
an agent of the Respondent within the meaning of Section
2(13) of the Act.
On about August 27, 2000, the Respondent suspended
its employee, Candice L. Bowles. On about September 4,
2000, the Respondent reassigned Candice L. Bowles from
taxi 3 (the tower) to taxi 5 (the trimmer).
On about October 23, 2000, the Respondent terminated
its employee, Richard Carroll.
The Respondent suspended and reassigned employee
Bowles and terminated employee Carroll because they
joined the Union and engaged in concerted activities, and
to discourage employees from engaging in these activities.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Respon-
dent has discriminated in regard to the hire or tenure or
terms or conditions of employment of its employees,
thereby discouraging membership in a labor organization,
and has engaged in unfair labor practices affecting com-
merce within the meaning of Section 8(a)(3) and (1) and
Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(3) and
(1) by suspending and reassigning Candice L. Bowles, we
shall order the Respondent to offer Bowles reassignment
to her former position on taxi 3. We also shall order the
Respondent to make Bowles whole for any loss of earn-
ings and other benefits suffered as a result of the discrimi-
nation against her. Backpay shall be computed in accor-
dance with Ogle Protection Service, 183 NLRB 682
(1970), enfd. 444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971), with interest as
prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB
1173 (1987).
In addition, having found that the Respondent has vio-
lated Section 8(a)(3) and (1) by terminating Richard Car-
roll, we shall order the Respondent to offer him full rein-
statement to his former job or, if that job no longer exists,
to a substantially equivalent position, without prejudice to
his seniority or any other rights or privileges previously
enjoyed. Further, we shall order the Respondent to make
Carroll whole for any loss of earnings and other benefits
suffered as a result of the discrimination against him.
Backpay shall be computed in accordance with F. W.
Woolworth Co., 90 NLRB 289 (1950), with interest as
prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, supra.
The Respondent also shall be required to remove from
its files any references to the unlawful suspension and
reassignment of Bowles and to Carroll’s unlawful termina-
tion, and to notify Bowles and Carroll in writing that this
has been done and that those actions will not be used
against them in any way.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the Re-
spondent, Black’s Railroad Transit Service, Galesburg,
Illinois, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Discharging, suspending, reassigning, or otherwise
discriminating against employees because they join a un-
ion or engage in concerted activities.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Within 14 days from the date of this Order, offer
Richard Carroll full reinstatement to his former job or, if
that job no longer exists, to a substantially equivalent posi-
tion, without prejudice to his seniority or other rights and
privileges previously enjoyed.
(b) Make employee Carroll whole for any loss of earn-
ings and other benefits suffered as a result of his unlawful
discharge, in the manner set forth in the remedy section of
this decision.
(c) Within 14 days from the date of this Order, offer
Candice L. Bowles reassignment to her former position on
taxi 3.
(d) Make employee Bowles whole for any loss of earn-
ings and other benefits suffered as a result of her unlawful
suspension and the Respondent’s reassignment of her from
BLACK’S RAILROAD TRANSIT SERVICE 327
taxi 3 to taxi 5, in the manner set forth in the remedy sec-
tion of this decision.
(e) Within 14 days from the date of this Order, remove
from its files any reference to the unlawful discharge of
employee Carroll and the unlawful suspension and reas-
signment of employee Bowles, and within 3 days thereaf-
ter, notify them in writing that this has been done and that
these discriminatory actions taken against them will not be
used against them in any way.
(f) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, make
available to the Board or its agents for examination and
copying, all payroll records, social security payment re-
cords, timecards, personnel records and reports, and all
other records, including an electronic copy of such records
if stored in electronic form, necessary to analyze the
amount of backpay due under the terms of this Order.
(g) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Galesburg, Illinois, copies of the attached
notice marked “Appendix.”2 Copies of the notice, on
forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 33,
after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized repre-
sentative, shall be posted by the Respondent and main-
tained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places in-
cluding all places where notices to employees are custom-
arily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Re-
spondent to ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced,
or covered by any other material. In the event that, during
the pendency of these proceedings, the Respondent has
gone out of business or closed the facility involved in
these proceedings, the Respondent shall duplicate and
mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice to all current
employees and former employees employed by the Re-
spondent at any time since August 27, 2000.
(h) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file with
the Regional Director a sworn certification of a responsi-
ble official on a form provided by the Region attesting to
the steps that the Respondent has taken to comply.

2 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government

The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated the National Labor Relations Act and has ordered
us to post and abide by this notice.

WE WILL NOT discharge, suspend, reassign, or other-
wise discriminate against you because you join a union or
engage in concerted activities.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, within 14 days from the date of this Order,
offer Richard Carroll full reinstatement to his former job
or, if that job no longer exists, to a substantially equivalent
position, without prejudice to his seniority or other rights
and privileges previously enjoyed.
WE WILL make Richard Carroll whole for any loss of
earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of his
unlawful discharge, with interest.
WE WILL, within 14 days from the date of this Order,
offer Candice L. Bowles reassignment to her former posi-
tion on taxi 3.
WE WILL make Candice L. Bowles whole for any loss
of earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of her
unlawful suspension and our reassignment of her from taxi
3 to taxi 5, with interest.
WE WILL, within 14 days from the date of this Order,
remove from our files any reference to the unlawful dis-
charge of employee Carroll and the unlawful suspension
and reassignment of employee Bowles, and WE WILL,
within 3 days thereafter, notify them in writing that this
has been done and that these discriminatory actions taken
against them will not be used against them in any way.
BLACK’S RAILROAD TRANSIT SERVICE