Bites of Boston Food Tours, LLC

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Aug 15, 2013

No. 85397975 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 15, 2013)

THIS OPINION IS NOT A
PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB

Mailed:
August 15, 2013

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
_____

In re Bites of Boston Food Tours, LLC
_____

Serial Nos. 85376420 and 85397975
_____

Kenneth C. Otis of Hendrick & Bryant LLP for Bites of Boston Food Tours, LLC.

Allison P. Schrody, Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 115 (John Lincoski,
Managing Attorney).
_____

Before Kuhlke, Shaw, and Gorowitz, Administrative Trademark Judges.

Opinion by Gorowitz, Administrative Trademark Judge:
Applicant has appealed the final refusals to register its marks BITES OF
BOSTON (in standard character form)1 and BITES OF BOSTON FOOD TOURS &
design, as set forth below for “entertainment and educational services, namely,
conducting cultural and culinary guided walking tours of neighborhoods,
restaurants, and specialty food shops”

1 Application Serial No. 8537640, filed July 20, 2011, based on Section 1(b) of the
Trademark Act (intent-to-use).
Serial Nos. 85376420 and 85397975

2

2
on the ground of likelihood of confusion pursuant to Section 2(d) of the Trademark
Act with the mark BITE OF SEATTLE for “organizing, conducting, and supervising
food festivals.”3
The appeals have been consolidated. With the exception of the marks, the
issues are identical.
Our determination of the issue of likelihood of confusion is based on an
analysis of all of the probative facts in evidence that are relevant to the factors set
forth in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA
1973). See also, In re Majestic Distilling Co., Inc., 315 F.3d 1311, 65 USPQ2d 1201
(Fed. Cir. 2003). In any likelihood of confusion analysis, two key considerations are
the similarities between the marks and the similarities between the goods and/or
services. See Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co., 544 F.2d 1098, 192

2 Application Serial No. 85376420, filed August 15, 2011, based on Section 1(b) of the
Trademark Act (intent-to-use).
3 Registration No. 1563882, issued October 31, 1989, renewed November 2, 2009.
Serial Nos. 85376420 and 85397975

3

USPQ 24 (CCPA 1976). See also, In re Dixie Restaurants Inc., 105 F.3d 1405, 41
USPQ2d 1531 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
We first evaluate the similarity or the dissimilarity of the marks in their
entireties and the strength thereof and starting with the mark in Serial No.
85376420, BITES OF BOSTON in standard character format. The prefatory
language, “BITES OF,” in applicant’s mark is similar to the prefatory portion of
registrant’s mark, “BITE OF SEATTLE.” In relation to registrant’s services, “BITE
OF” has the same meaning as “TASTE OF,” a term frequently used in connection
with food festivals, i.e. “Taste of Chicago,” (referenced infra), Annual Taste of the
Deerfield Valley (Exhibit to Denial of Request for Reconsideration) and Taste of the
Beach (Examining Attorney’s Brief, p. 7). When used in connection with food
festivals “BITE OF” and “TASTE OF” refer to the tasting of local foods. As such,
the term “BITE OF” in the registrant’s mark is highly suggestive. The terminal
portion of registrant’s mark supplies the name of the local area in which the festival
is held, in this case “Seattle.”
When the common elements of conflicting marks [BITES OF and BITE OF]
are words that are suggestive (i.e., “weak”), this reduces the likelihood of confusion.
See, e.g., Keebler Co. v. Murray Bakery Products, 866 F.2d 1386, 9 USPQ2d 1736
(Fed. Cir. 1989) (PECAN SANDIES and PECAN SHORTEES); Magnaflux Corp. v.
Sonoflux Corp., 231 F.2d 669, 109 USPQ 313 (CCPA 1956) (MAGAFLUX and
SONOFLUX); and Land-O-Nod Co. v. Paulison, 220 USPQ 61 (TTAB 1983)
(CHIROPRACTIC and CHIRO-MATIC). As such, since the cited mark is weak, it is
Serial Nos. 85376420 and 85397975

4

entitled to a narrow scope of protection and the services will need to be closely
related to establish likelihood of confusion.
There is even less similarity between BITE OF SEATTLE and the mark in
Serial No. 8537640, BITES OF BOSTON FOOD TOURS & design, as set forth
below:
.
We turn next to the du Pont factor of the similarity or dissimilarity of the
services. As set forth in the Dixie Restaurants case:
Likelihood of confusion must be determined based on an
analysis of the mark as applied to the … services recited
in applicant's application vis-a-vis the … services recited
in [a] … registration, rather than what the evidence
shows the...services to be.
In re Dixie Restaurants Inc., 41 USPQ2d at 1534, quoting Canadian Imperial Bank
v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , 811 F.2d 1490, 1 USPQ2d 1813, 1815 (Fed. Cir. 1987).
Applicant’s services are identified as “entertainment and educational
services, namely, conducting cultural and culinary guided walking tours of
neighborhoods, restaurants, and specialty food shops.” A “tour is a trip with visits
to various places of interest for business, pleasure, or instruction,” or “a group
Serial Nos. 85376420 and 85397975

5

organized for such a trip or for a shorter sightseeing excursion”4 and a “walking tour
is a tour on which you walk rather than using [sic] transport.”5 With respect to
applicant’s services, a “tour” is a short sightseeing excursion, on which the
participants walk.
The services in the cited registration are identified as “organizing,
conducting, and supervising food festivals.” A “food festival is a festival,6 usually
held annually, that uses food, often produce, as its central theme.7
The examining attorney asserts that the “services are closely related in that
food festivals and cultural and culinary tours commonly emanate from a single
source. In particular, food festivals commonly feature cultural or culinary tours as
events.” Examining Attorney’s Brief, p. 6. To support her position, the examining
attorney has submitted ten third-party registrations. However, none of the
registrations include both festivals and guided walking tours of neighborhoods,
restaurants and specialty food shops. To the contrary, to the extent that any

4 ‘The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright
©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin
Company, accessed through The Free Dictionary. Com (www.thefreedictionary.com).
The Board may take judicial notice of dictionary definitions, Univ. of Notre Dame du Lac v.
J.C. Gourmet Food Imp. Co., 213 USPQ 594 (TTAB 1982), aff'd, 703 F.2d 1372, 217 USPQ
505 (Fed. Cir. 1983), including online dictionaries that exist in printed format or have
regular fixed editions. In re Red Bull GmbH, 78 USPQ2d 1375, 1377 (TTAB 2006).
5 “Collins English Dictionary” © 2013Collins, accessed through One Look Dictionary Search
(www.onelook.com).
6 A festival is an event, usually and ordinarily staged by a local community, which centers
on and celebrates some unique aspect of that community and the Festival. “The Free
Dictionary by Farlex” © 2013 Farlex, Inc. (www.thefreedictionary.com)
7 Id. The largest food festival in the United States (and the world) is the Taste of Chicago
held in Chicago, Illinois. Id.
Serial Nos. 85376420 and 85397975

6

registration includes both food festivals and tours, the tours are primarily tours of
wineries.8
The examining attorney also submitted web pages from a number of different
sites. Some of the web pages relate to various festivals. All of the festivals are
annual events held at the same time each year. While a number of the events offer
tours, none of the events offer guided walking tours. To wit, the examining attorney
relied on the following: Outer Banks Restaurant Association’s Taste of the Beach (a
food festival offering brewery tours); Shelburne Vineyard 3rd Annual Autumn Wine
and Food Festival, (a wine and food festival at a winery, which offers tours of the
winery); New York City Wine & Food Festival, (a food festival offering a tour of a
butcher’s warehouse); and Mananyunk StrEAT Food Festival, (the kick-off of the
five day Restaurant Week; which offers foods from “some of Philadelphia’s best food
trucks” and includes a restaurant tour which highlights “apple/fall time specialties
by our Manayunk restaurants and eateries” and is all on one street.”). The
following webpages, also submitted by the examining attorney, constitute evidence
that food festivals are longer than one day and that guided walking tours are not
offered: the Scottsdale Culinary Festival, held April 5-10, 2011 (Office Action dated
November 16, 2011 and The Summit Wine & Food Festival, held September 2011
(Office Action dated June 8, 2012)

8 Reg. No. 3855912 for the mark SAVOR THE CENTRAL COAST also includes guided
tours of local farmers markets and gardens; and of culinary facilities.
Serial N

os. 85376420 and 85397975
7

Serial N

A
attorney
(www.fo
tours (w

9 Denial
os. 853764
s exhibits
submit
odtourfind
alking, co

of Request
20 and 85
to the de
ted docu
er.com).9
oking, ove

for Reconsi
397975
nial of the
ments fr
The site is
rnight-wha
deration da
8
request f
om the
an “impa
tever!) fro
ted January
or reconsi
website,
rtial site [
m around
4, 2013.
deration,
“Food
which] com
the world
the exami
Tour Fin
piles culi
. Listings
ning
der”
nary
are
Serial N

all unpa
pages cl
tours ar
week, an
E
C

os. 853764
id. Infor
early diffe
e all shor
d include
ating Ash
olorado S
20 and 85
mation is
rentiate g
t in durat
both culin
ville: Do
prings F

397975
taken from
uided wal
ion (gener
ary and cu
wntown W
ood Tour
9
the tour
king food
ally 2-3 h
ltural info
alking T
: Manitou
operator
tours from
ours), are
rmation.
our,
Spring F

s’ websites
festivals.
offered s
See, for ex

ood Tour
.” These
The wal
everal tim
ample,
, and
web
king
es a
Serial N

T

T
trips wi
These t
Travelim
Taste of
North In
os. 853764
he Miami
he Food T
th visits t
ours were
es: Peru
South In
dia (15 da
20 and 85
Culinary
our Finder
o various p
of longer
With Gust
dia (14 da
y tour wh
397975
Tours: S
also inclu
laces of in
duration a
o (11 day
y tour whi
ich costs £
10
outh Bea
des inform
terest for
nd were m
tour which
ch costs £
1995).
ch Food
ation rela
business,
ore expen
costs $46
1695), and
Tour

ted to tour
pleasure,
sive. See
00.00 (CA
TripFeas
s consistin
or instruc
, for exam
D), TripF
t: Delicaci
g of
tion.
ple:
east:
es of
Serial N

os. 85376420 and 85397975
11

Serial N

S
food fes
(www.S
Peruvia
Reconsi

os. 853764
ome of the
tivals. Se
outhAmeri
n Food Fe
deration d
20 and 85
longer cu
e, for exam
ca.travel)
stival Mis
ated Janua
397975
linary tour
ple, the
consistin
tura on a
ry 4, 2013
12
s may be
web page
g of an
Culinary P
).
planned ar
from Sout
article en
eru Tour.
ound or in
h America
titled “In
” (Denial
clude stop
Travel N
dulge in
of Reques
s at
ews,
the
t for

Serial N

T
“Traveli
Mistura
include
compan
Kerala
offering
India an
included
Festival
os. 853764
he same fe
mes: Mis
festival.
attendanc
y offering
and India”
tours whi
d a Frenc
in the So
is the onl
20 and 85
stival app
tura & Ma
The exam
e of food
tours whic
) and Sout
ch attend
h Food Fe
uth India
y food festi
397975
ears in Th
chu Picch
ining att
festivals:
h attend f
h India T
food festi
stival”) (th
Temple T
val offered
13
e Food Tou
u” is listed
orney also
Kerala Tra
ood festiv
emple Tou
vals, such
e evidenc
ours are r
.) Examin
r Finder,
. The tou
refers to
vel Tours
als featuri
rs,(“an on
as a food
e reveals t
eligious an
ing Attorn
where a 7
r includes
two othe
(“an onli
ng “authe
line travel
festival in
hat most
d that th
ey’s Appe

day tour ca
a visit to
r tours, w
ne travel
ntic Cuisin
tour comp
Pondiche
of the festi
e French F
al Brief, p.
lled
the
hich
tour
e of
any
rry,
vals
ood
9.
Serial Nos. 85376420 and 85397975

14

The crux of this matter is the definition of “tour.” All of the evidence offered
by the examining attorney to establish that festivals and tours are related and
travel in the same channels of trade, relate to the tours discussed above, which
consist of the longer, more expensive trips with visits to various places of interest
for business, pleasure, or instruction. With only one exception, there is no evidence
that guided walking tours and food festivals are offered in the same channels of
trade.10
All in all, the evidence does not establish that food festivals and
culinary/cultural guided walking tours are offered by the same entities. Neither is
there evidence that consumers would expect culinary and cultural guided walking
tours, which are of short duration and are not limited to specific dates, to emanate
from the same source as or to be associated with food festivals, which are of longer
duration and generally occur annually at the same time of year.
Having considered all the evidence and arguments on the relevant du Pont
factors, and in particular the highly suggestive nature of the cited mark and the
differences in the services, we find that applicant’s marks are not likely to cause
confusion with the registrant’s mark BITE OF SEATTLE.
Decision: The refusals to register Serial Nos. 85376420 and 85397975 are
reversed.

10 The exception is the seven day tour called “Travelimes: Mistura & Machu Picchu,”
discussed supra, which appears on The Food Tour Finder website.