Bethlehem Steel Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Mar 21, 1944

55 N.L.R.B. 658 (N.L.R.B. 1944)

In the Matter of BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY and AMERICAN FEDERA-
TION OF LABOR , FEDERAL LOCAL 23332
Case No. 3-R-735.-Decided March 21, 1944
Mr. Gerald J. Reilly, of Bethlehem, Pa., for the Company.
Mr. Neil J. Cunningham, of Buffalo, N. Y., for the Union.
Mr. 'William Strong, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a petition duly filed by American Federation of Labor,
Federal Local 23332, herein called the Union, alleging that a question
affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of em-
ployees of Bethlehem Steel Company, Lackawanna, New York, herein
called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for
an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Harold X. Summers,
Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held at New York City, on Febru-
ary 17,1944. The Company and the Union appeared and participated.'
All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and
cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the
issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free
from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. At the hearing the
Company moved that the petition be dismissed on the ground that the
persons whom the Union seeks to include in the unit are not within the
meaning of the term "employees" as defined by the Act, and for the
further reason that the unit sought by the Union is inappropriate.'
The Trial Examiner reserved ruling for the Board. For reasons set
forth more fully below, the motion is denied.
Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
a Und ed Steelworkers of America , CIO, has indicated that it has no interest in this
proceeding.
2 Although at the outset of the heai,ng the Company stated that it was entering only a
special appearance to contest the Board' s jurisdiction ' for these same reasons, the Com-
pany thereafter participated fully in the hearing.
55 N. L. R. B.. No 116
658
BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
659
Bethlehem Steel Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, is engaged
at a plant ,at Lackawanna, New York, in the manufacture of steel
products. During 1943, the Company at its Lackawanna plant used
raw materials valued in excess of $66,000,000, more than 85 percent
of which was delivered from points outside the State of New York,
and manufactured finished products valued in excess of $100,000,000,
more than 80 percent of which was shipped to its plant from points
outside the State of New York.
We find that the Company is engaged in commerce within the mean-
ing of the National Labor Relations Act.
IT. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED
American Federation of Labor, Federal Local 23332 is a labor
organization admitting to membership employees of the Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
The Company has refused to grant recognition to the Union as the
exclusive bargaining representative of certain of the Company's em-
ployees.
A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hear-
ing, indicates that the Union represents a substantial number of em-
ployees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.3
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Union seeks a unit composed of all employees in the Fire De-
partment of the Company's Lackawanna plant, excluding the chief
and the assistant chief. The Company asserts that none of the per-
sons whom the Union seeks to include in the unit fall within the defini-
tion of the term "employee" as used in the Act, that the firemen are
"identified with management and their interests are opposed to the
interests of the majority of the workers" at the plant, that the exer-
cise of collective bargaining rights by the firemen would place them
in "a position in which there would be a conflict between their duties
and responsibilities to the Company and their own interests," that
the firemen exercise supervisory functions over the production and
8 The Field Examiner reported that the Union submitted 35 authorization cards, all of
which bore names of employees in the alleged appropriate unit, which contains 44 persons-
660 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
maintenance employees and their supervisors, and that the firemen
occupy positions of a confidential nature. The Company further as-
serts that in the event the Board should find no merit in these con-
tentions, that in addition to the chief and the assistant chief, the
captains, lieutenants, and clerical employees in the Fire Department
should be excluded from the unit. Nothing in the Act, its legislative
history, or the record before us supports the Company's contention
that the Fire Department personnel do not come within the definition
of the term "employee" as used in the Act. Moreover, nothing in
our experience leads us to believe that the exercise of collective bar-
gaining rights under the Act is incompatible with the competent
performance of their duties as employees.
The Fire Department is engaged in the prevention and fighting of
fires on the Company's property, and in the maintenance of the neces-
sary equipment. While the firemen may, in the enforcement of fire
prevention regulations recommend the suspension of work and can
report violations of regulations by employees to their superiors, the
firemen are not in a supervisory capacity with respect to ordinary em-
ployees in the recognized sense of that term. Nor can it be said that
the firemen are representatives of management in such a sense as to
place them within the purview of our decision in The Maryland Dry-
dock case,4 upon which the Company relies. Likewise without sub-
it tance is the Company's contention that firemen are confidential em-
ployees of such a type as to require their exclusion from all units .5
The staff of the Fire Department consists of 11 officers, including a
chief, an assistant chief, 2 captains, 7 lieutenants, 43 patrolmen, and 2
clerical employees.6 Orders originate with the chief and are trans-
mitted in turn through the various officers to the patrolmen. The
officers below the chief direct, supervise, and inspect the work of the
patrolmen. In this hierarchy, the lieutenants are the immediate
supervisors of the patrolmen. None of the officers have the power to
discharge the patrolmen; all of them have the power to suspend patrol-
men for infractions of rules subject to further action by higher au-
thorities.' Original on-the-spot suspensions are followed by hearings
at which the suspended patrolmen and the charging officers, including
4 Matter of The Maryland Drydock Company , 49 N. L. R . B. 733.
5 The Company made similar contentions with respect to its plant guards or police at this
plant, which we likewise found to be without merit, in Matter of Bethlehem Steel Corpora-
tion , 47 N L . R. B 1330.
O The Fire Department is one of the plant -protection units , which include also police,
medical, safety , and air raid units The assistant superintendent of industrial relations
at the plant is also the chief of plant-protection , and is the coordinator of all of the
above units
T Although the record is not entirely clear, it appears that only the chief and the assistant
chief can effectively recommend other changes in the status of employees . Neither of these
two officers can discharge any employees.
BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY 661
captains and lieutenants, present their respective versions of, the in-
fraction incidents in question. Patrolmen receive no pay for periods
during which they are under suspension.
It is evident that the captains and lieutenants fall within our defini-
tion of supervisory employees. We shall exclude them from the
unit.8
The clerical employees in the Fire Department are engaged entirely
at clerical work and perform none of the duties assigned to patrol-
men. We shall exclude them from the unit.
We find that all patrolmen in the Fire Department at the Lacka-
wanna plant of the Company, excluding the clerical employees, the
chief, the assistant chief, captains, and lieutenants, and any other
supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote, discharge,
discipline, or otherwise effect changes in the status of employees, or
effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for
the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section
9 (b) of the Act.
V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
We shall direct that the question concerning representation which
has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot among the em-
ployees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-
roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Election
herein, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the
Direction.9
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National
Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela-
tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of, National Labor
Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, it is hereby
DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Bethlehem Steel
Company, Lackawanna, New York, an election by secret ballot shall
be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days
from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision
of the Regional Director for the Third Region, acting in this matter
as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to
Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among
the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above,
8In a prior proceeding the parties stipulated that an appropriate unit of plant guards,
who are a part of the Company's plant-protection forces , should not include captains, first
and second lieutenants , and desk sergeants . Matter or Bethlehem Steel Corporation, 47
N. L. R. B. 1330.
'The Union wishes to be designated on the ballot as the "A. F. of L." The request is
hereby granted.
662 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preced-
ing the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work
during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or
temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces
of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls,
but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged
for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of
the election, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented
by the A. F. of L., for the purposes of collective bargaining.