Benjamin Porter, Jr., Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 14, 2000
01990888 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 14, 2000)

01990888

01-14-2000

Benjamin Porter, Jr., Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Benjamin Porter, Jr., )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01990888

) Agency No. 1-F-914-0027-98

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On November 11, 1998, complainant filed a timely appeal with this

Commission from a final agency decision (FAD) received by him on

October 15, 1998, pertaining to his complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.<1> In his complaint, complainant

alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race

(African-American), and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

Complainant was accused of standing outside the Computer Forwarding

Unit with his arm around a clerk;

Complainant was accused of failing to follow reasonable work rules of

conduct and entering personnel without authorization; and

Complainant was issued a Letter-of-Warning (LOW).

The agency dismissed complainant's claims for failure to file a timely

formal complaint. Specifically, the agency found that complainant

received his notice-of-right-to-file-a-complaint form (Notice) on July 27,

1998, but did not file his complaint until sixteen days later, on August

12, 1998.

Complainant raised no arguments on appeal regarding the timeliness of

his formal complaint.

The record includes a copy of the Notice, which informs complainant

that he has fifteen (15) days to file a formal complaint. A certified

receipt card shows that complainant received the Notice on July 27, 1998.

The record also includes a copy of complainant's formal complaint,

stamped as received by the Santa Clara EEO office on August 12, 1998.

The complaint arrived in an envelope addressed to the agency's Ingelwood

EEO office, but does not include a stamp, postmark, or other evidence

showing that it was mailed.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106(b) requires the filing of a written

complaint with an appropriate agency official within fifteen (15) calendar

days after the date of receipt of the notice of the right to file a formal

complaint. Volume 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified and

hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2)) provides that the agency

shall dismiss a complaint that fails to comply with the applicable time

limits contained in �� 1614.105, 1614.106, and 1614.204(c), unless the

agency extends the time limits in accordance with � 1614.604(c).

A document is deemed to have been filed on the date it is received

or postmarked. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified

and hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(b)). If the document was

mailed, but the postmark is illegible, then the document is considered

timely if it was received within five days of the expiration of the

applicable filing period. Id.

Absent any evidence that complainant's formal complaint was mailed,

the Commission assumes that it was delivered by some other means,

and considers the complaint filed on the date it was received, August

12, 1998. In order to be timely, complainant should have filed his

complaint by Tuesday, August 11, 1998. Complainant has provided no

argument to justify tolling the applicable time limit. Accordingly,

the agency's dismissal is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1199)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS

OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405). All requests and arguments must be

submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the

absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed

timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration

of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604).

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the

other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S1199)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

January 14, 2000

____________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date Equal Employment Assistant 1On November 9, 1999, revised

regulations governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process

went into effect. These regulations apply to all federal sector

EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative process.

Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations found

at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.