Barbara E. Sherrill, Complainant,v.Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Department of Justice (Executive Office of the U.S. Attorneys), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 28, 2012
0520120194 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 28, 2012)

0520120194

03-28-2012

Barbara E. Sherrill, Complainant, v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Department of Justice (Executive Office of the U.S. Attorneys), Agency.


Barbara E. Sherrill,

Complainant,

v.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.,

Attorney General,

Department of Justice

(Executive Office of the U.S. Attorneys),

Agency.

Request No. 05-2012-0194

Appeal No. 0120113046

Agency No. USA200900509

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Barbara E. Sherrill v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 0120113046 (November 23, 2011). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

Complainant continues to raise arguments that she has raised prior to her request for reconsideration. Complainant is reminded that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal and must meet specific criteria in order for reconsideration to be granted. Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110) (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17; e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agriculture, EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). The Commission notes that the grant of summary judgment by the EEOC Administrative Law Judge was proper because there were no genuine issues of material fact. Other than Complainant's unsupported assertions and speculation, there is no evidence showing that the Agency, as a joint employer with a private sector employer, had discriminated against Complainant when she was not considered or selected for a position. Complainant has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the Agency's actions were motivated by discriminatory animus. The ultimate burden of persuasion remains Complainant's. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 120 S.Ct. 2097 (2000).

After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120113046 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 28, 2012

__________________

Date

2

05-2012-0194

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

05-2012-0194