August J. Holmquist, Complainant,v.Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security1, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 21, 2007
0120063737 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 21, 2007)

0120063737

09-21-2007

August J. Holmquist, Complainant, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security1, Agency.


August J. Holmquist,

Complainant,

v.

Michael Chertoff,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security1,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01200637372

Agency No. 7033026

DECISION

On June 5, 2006, complainant filed a premature appeal concerning his

equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment

discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation

Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

The appeal is deemed timely since the agency subsequently issued a final

agency decision on November 22, 2006, and the appeal is accepted pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(a). For the following reasons, the Commission

REVERSES the agency's final decision.

On January 8, 2003, complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that he

was discriminated against on the basis of disability when, on August 6,

2002, he was not selected for a position as Transportation Security

Screener, SV-0019-D at the Orlando, Florida International Airport.

Specifically, complainant claims he could have passed the Physical

Performance Test for the Security Screener position if he had been given

the opportunity to take it. Complainant contends that the agency denied

him the opportunity to take this physical exam (and thereby refused to

hire him) based on the perception that because he was disabled, he could

not pass the test.

At the conclusion of the investigation, complainant was provided with a

copy of the report of investigation and notice of his right to request

a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge. In February 2004,

complainant requested a final agency decision in lieu of a hearing.

In November 2006, thirty three months later, the agency dismissed the

complaint asserting that the Aviation and Transportation Security Act

(ATSA) "preempted" the Rehabilitation Act, and as such, the complaint

failed to state a claim. However, in Getzlow v. Dept. of Homeland

Security, Appeal No. 0120053286 (June 26, 2007), the Commission determined

that, contrary to the agency's assertions, the ATSA does not divest the

Commission of jurisdiction over complaints alleging discrimination under

the Rehabilitation Act or any other statute the Commission enforces.

In Getzlow, the Commission further found that the complainant must

show that he/she can meet the ATSA-mandated standards in order to be

qualified under the Rehabilitation Act. If this record clearly showed

that complainant could not meet the ATSA-mandated standards, then the

complaint could be properly dismissed. However, the record before us

is too incomplete to draw such a conclusion. In fact, the record before

the Commission contains no formal complaint, no EEO Counselor's report,

no evidence of the ATSA-mandated qualification standards and no copy of

the position description/vacancy announcement at issue. This record is

woefully incomplete.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is REVERSED. The complaint is hereby REMANDED to the agency for

further processing in accordance with this decision and the ORDER below

ORDER

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. On remand, the agency shall conduct a supplemental

investigation to develop an impartial and appropriate factual record upon

which to make findings on the claim raised in the formal complaint.

Once the supplemental investigation is complete, the agency shall

provide complainant with a copy of it and notify him that he again has

the opportunity to request a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108(f).

The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant that it has received

the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this

decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to complainant a copy of

the supplemental investigative file and also shall notify complainant of

the appropriate rights within ninety (90) calendar days of the date this

decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior

to that time. If the complainant requests a final decision without a

hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days

of receipt of complainant's request. The agency's delay in issuing its

original final decision in this case is inexcusable. The agency shall

process the remanded claim within the time limits set forth herein.

Any further delay may result in a sanction against the agency.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 21, 2007

__________________

Date

1 This complaint was originally filed with the Department of

Transportation. However, effective March 1, 2003, pursuant to the

Homeland Security Act, this complaint came under the jurisdiction of

the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

2 Due to a new data system, this case has been re-designated with the

above referenced appeal number.

??

??

??

??

2

0120063737

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036