Arthur D. Hunter, Complainant,v.Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 21, 2000
01994747 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 21, 2000)

01994747

03-21-2000

Arthur D. Hunter, Complainant, v. Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Arthur D. Hunter, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01994747

) Agency No. 99-313-0M

Lawrence H. Summers, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Treasury, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency's April 14, 1999 decision dismissing

the complaint on the basis of untimely EEO counselor contact is proper

pursuant to the provisions of 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be

codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(2)).<1>

The record shows that Complainant sought EEO counseling on February 10,

1999, claiming that he had been discriminated against on the bases of race

and physical disability when on January 31, 1997, he was forced to retire

on disability after being informed that the agency could not accommodate

his disability and the he should consider retirement. Complainant stated

to the EEO counselor that he knew that he had to seek EEO counseling

within 45 days of the alleged discriminatory event but that he wished

to proceed with EEO counseling because his situation �was unusual�.

Subsequently, Complainant filed a formal complaint which raised the

same issue he had brought to the attention of the EEO counselor.

Complainant also claimed that on March 8, 1999, he became aware that,

prior to his retirement, the agency had been advised to provide voice

activated equipment to accommodate his disability. He claimed that had

he been aware of this recommendation, he would not have resigned.

The agency issued a final decision dismissing the complaint on the grounds

of untimely EEO counselor contact after finding that Complainant should

have suspected discrimination in January 1997, when the agency refused

to accommodate his disability.

The Commission applies a "reasonable suspicion" standard to the

triggering date for determining the timeliness of the contact with an

EEO counselor. Cochran v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05920399 (June 18, 1992). Under this standard, the time period

for contacting an EEO counselor is triggered when the complainant should

reasonably suspect discrimination, but before all the facts that would

support a charge of discrimination may have become apparent. Id.;

Paredes v. Nagle, 27 FEP Cases 1345 (D.D.C. 1982).

Based on the foregoing, we find that Complainant suspected or should

have reasonably suspected discrimination when he was advised to retire

because the agency could not accommodate his disability. Therefore, he

should have sought EEO counseling within 45 days of January 31, 1997.

The record shows, however, that he sought counseling two years later,

in February 1999.

Accordingly, the final agency decision was proper and is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S1199)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

March 21, 2000

DATE

Carlton

M.

Hadden,

Acting

Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________

_________________________________

1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

Federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.