Armour and Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsOct 17, 194564 N.L.R.B. 290 (N.L.R.B. 1945) Copy Citation In the Matter of ARMOUR AND COMPANY and LOCAL UNION # 8, UNITED PACKINGHOUSE WORKERS OF AMERICA, C. I. O. Case' No. 17-R-1158.-Decided October 17,1945 Messrs. E. M. Connor and L. E. Dinger, of South Omaha, Nebr., and J. C. Moore, of Chicago, Ill., for the Company. Messrs. Patrick Ratigan, Harry Peters, and James Pazderka, of Omaha, Nebr., and Mr. Fred J. Ramano, of South Omaha, Nebr., for the C. I. O. Mr. Cody Quinn, of Kansas City, Mo., and Mr. A. Howard Stough- ton, of Omaha, Nebr., for the I. A. M. Mr. Stanley B. Korengold, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon a petition duly filed by Local Union #8, United Packinghouse Workers of America, C. I. 0., herein called the C. I. 0., alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representa- tion of employees`of Armour and Company, South Omaha, Nebraska, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board pro- vided for an appropriate hearing upon due notice before Margaret L. Fassig, Trial Examiner. Said hearing was held" at Omaha, Nebraska, on,July 10, 1945. The Company, the C. I. 0., and the International Association of Machinists, A. F. L., herein called the I. A. M., appeared and participated. All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examiner's rulings made' at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an opportunity to file'briefs with the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY The Company, an Illinois corporation, with its principal office 'ill Chicago, Illinois, is engaged in the slaughtering, processing, and 04 N. L. R. B., No. 52. 290 }._ _ , ARMOUR AND COMPANY 291 packing of- livestock products at its plant in South Omaha, Nebraska, the sole plant involved in this _proceeding. During the year 1944, the Company slaughtered, processed, and distributed' over 500,000,000 pounds of products valued in excess of $1,000,000, of which approxl- mately 75 percent was shipped to points outside the State of Nebraska. The, Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 11. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED International Association of Machinists, affiliated with the Amer- ican Federation of Labor, is a labor organization admitting to mem- bership employees of the Company. Local Union #8, United Packinghouse Workers of America, affili- ated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, is a labor organ- ization admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On June 14 , 1945, the C. I. O. notified the Company that it desired recognition as the bargaining representative of certain of the Com- pany's - employees . - The Company ,' however, refused to grant; such recognition until the C . I. O. has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. A statement of a Board agent, introduced into evidence at the hear- ing, indicates that the C . 1. O. represents a substantial number of employees in the unit hereinafter found appropriate.l We find that a question effecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Colnpany , within the meaning of Section 9, (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 1V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT ; THE DETERMINATION OF- REPRESENTATIVES The C. I. O. desi-res to , include- -a - 11 checkers ,;,scarlers, gang leaders, inspectors , and graders employed by the Company in the bargaining unit of production and maintenance employees which-it currently rep- resents. It would also include -within the bargaining unit the Com- pany's machinists for whom the I. A. M. was certified in April 1940 as the collective bargaining representative . 2 While'ma,intaining that the machinists constitute a separate ,appropriate unit, the I . A. M. at the same time agrees to the inclusion of the machinists in the unit of pro- I The Field Examiner reported that the C I 0 submitted 41 authorization cards. that of these, 4 were dated August and September 1944 , 30 were dated May 1945 , and 7 were dated June 1945 , and that there are 75 persons in the unit petitioned for At the hearing the C I O . submitted 6 additional membership application cards , of which`4 were dated- June 1945 , and,2 were dated July 1945. As evidence of its interest , the I A . bI submitted to the Trial Examiner 4 authorization cards, out of the 6 employees in-the unit it seeks to represent 2 Matter of Armour f Company, 22 N. L R. B 818 292 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD duction and maintenance employees in the event the C. I. O. is selected as their exclusive bargaining representative. The Company does not oppose the position of either the C. I. O. or the I. A. M. Although we normally adhere to a prior Board finding as to the appropriate unit upon which a history of collective bargaining has been predicated, inasmuch as the I. A. M. agrees to the inclusion of the machinists in the existing unit of production and maintenance employees should the C. I. O. win the election, we are of the opinion .that the machinists may either remain a-separate bargaining unit or be so included.4 We shall, therefore, make no present determination of the appropriate unit, but shall reserve such finding pending the results of the election hereinafter directed. We shall direct that an election be held among the machinists,' and our finding of the appro- priate unit will depend, in part, upon the desires of those employees as expressed in such election. If the machinists select the C. I. O. as their bargaining representative, they will thereby be,deemed to'have indicated their desire to be included'in a unit of production- and main- tenance employees and will be part of such unit; if, however, they select the I. A. Al. as their bargaining representative, they will be deemed to have indicated their desire to remain a separate appro- priate unit. - It is also our opinion that all checkers, scalers, gang leaders, in- sl ectors, and graders'may appropriately be included in 'the existing unit of production and maintenance employees. Inasmuch as these employees have not been included in the production and maintenance unit, we shall direct that a separate election be held to determine their desires in the matter. Accordingly, we shall make no 'present unit finding with respect to the foregoing employees pending the outcome of the election. If in such election, these employees select the C. I. O. as their bargaining representative, they will thereby be deemed-to-have indicated their desire to be included in the existing unit of production and maintenance employees and the C. I. O. may bargain for then- as part of such unit. We shall direct that separate elections by secret ballot be held among the employees in each of the voting groups, described below. who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the Direction of Elections herein, subject to the' limitations and additions set forth in the Direction: 1. ' All machinists, excluding all supervisory employees with au- thority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect 3 Hatter of The Duff-Norton Manufacturing Company , 60 N. L R B 186; Matter of Dam Manufacturing Company . 52 N L R B 1034 4See Matter of American Can Company, 61 N. L R B . 1631 ; Mattet of Chemurgic Corporation, 60 N L . R. B 412 - - 5The parties agreed that all, machinists listed on the Compan3 ' s Exhibit 1. with the exception of Dooley, should comprise the bargaining unit I ' e ARMOUR AND' CO_IIPANY 293 changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, to determine whether they wish to be represented by the C. I. 0., or by the I. A. M., or by neither. 2. All checkers, scalers, gang leaders, inspectors, and graders, ex- cluding watchmen, foremen, and all other supervisory employees with authority to hire, :promote, discharge, discipline, or otherwise effect changes-in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such ac- tion, to determine whether or not-they desire to be represented by the C. I. O. - As stated above, there will be no final determination of the appro- priate unit or units pending the results of the elections. DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS By virtae of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Rela- tions Board Rules and Regulations-Seiies 3, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as part of the investigation to-ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Armour and Com- pany; South Omaha, Nebraska, elections by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) clays from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Seventeenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations, Board, and subject to Article III, Sections 10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations, among the following employees who were employed.by the Company during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction', including employees ' who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and in- cluding any employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding any who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to^the date of the election : 1. The employees in the' first voting group described in Section IV, above, to determine whether they desire to be represented by Local Union #8, United Packingliouse'Workers of America, C. I. 0., or by International Association o£,Machinists, A. F. L., for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. - 2. The employees in the' second voting group described in Section IV, above, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Local Union #8, United Packinghouse `Yorkers of America, C. I. 0., for the purposes of collective bargaining. MR. GERARD D. REILLY took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Elections. 0 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation