Armand L.,1 Complainant,v.Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Sep 13, 2019

2019003538 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 13, 2019)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013

Armand L.,1
Complainant,

v.

Megan J. Brennan,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Pacific Area),
Agency.

Appeal No. 2019003538

Agency No. 1F941002318

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC
or Commission) from the Agency's decision dated July 2, 2018, dismissing his complaint of
unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Foreign Mail Clerk
at the Agency’s SF ISC facility in San Francisco, California.

On June 15, 2018, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him
to discrimination on the bases of race/national origin (Hispanic),2 sex (male), age, and reprisal
for prior protected EEO activity when, on March 11, 2018, while he was speaking to a co-
worker, he was interrupted by management and told to stop talking while other employees were

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name
when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website.

2 Complainant alleged discrimination on race, without specification, but referred to himself as
Hispanic in his formal complaint.
2019003538

2
talking. He indicated that he and the co-worker with whom he was speaking are Hispanic and the
other employees who were talking are Chinese.

The Agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state
a claim. The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment
who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color,
religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.103, .106(a). The
Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one
who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment
for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049
(April 21, 1994). When the complainant does not allege he or she is aggrieved within the
meaning of the regulations, the agency shall dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim
pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1).

Here, we concur with the Agency that Complainant failed to allege sufficient facts, which if
proven true and considered together, would establish that he suffered harm or loss with respect to
a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Being told on one
occasion to stop speaking while others are speaking is, at most, an annoyance and is insufficient
to support a claim. See Lassiter v. Army, EEOC Appeal No. 0120122332 (Oct. 10, 2012)
(personality conflicts, general workplace disputes, trivial slights and petty annoyances between a
supervisor and a complainant do not rise to the level of harassment); and Phillips v. Dep’t of
Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05960030 (July 12, 1996) (the allegation that a supervisor
had “verbally attacked” the complainant on one occasion, attempted to charge him with AWOL,
and disagreed with the time the complainant entered into a sign in log, were found to be
insufficient to state a harassment claim). To the extent that, on appeal, Complainant raises
additional claims of harassment and/or discrimination, these allegations are not currently before
the Commission. The instant complaint, as written, without more, simply does not state a viable
claim of discrimination or unlawful retaliation.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

2019003538

3
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0617)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or
the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish
that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact
or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or
operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of
Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. A party
shall have twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party’s timely request for
reconsideration in which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405;
Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110),
at Chap. 9 § VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the
Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Complainant’s request may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC
20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a
legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail
within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The
agency’s request must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC’s Federal Sector EEO Portal
(FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). The request or opposition must also include proof of
service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration
as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any
supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The
Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very
limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within
ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action,
you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or
department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do
so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the
administrative processing of your complaint.

2019003538

4
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may
request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or
costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may
request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of
court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The
court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter
the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to
File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations

September 13, 2019
Date