Arlena Gordon, Complainant,v.Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 19, 2000
01990414 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 19, 2000)

01990414

04-19-2000

Arlena Gordon, Complainant, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.


Arlena Gordon v. Department of Justice

01990414

April 19, 2000

Arlena Gordon, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01990414

Janet Reno, ) Agency No. P-98-9345

Attorney General, )

Department of Justice, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On October 19, 1998, complainant filed a timely appeal with this

Commission from an agency decision dated September 23, 1998, pertaining

to her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e

et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.<1> In her complaint, complainant

alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race

(White), age (43), and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

In April 1996, complainant applied for the position of Associate

Warden's Secretary, and she was not selected. Complainant alleges

that less qualified candidates were selected for the position; and

On October 7, 1997, complainant was notified that she was not selected

for the position of Associate Warden's Secretary. Complainant alleges

racial partiality in the selection process.

The agency dismissed complainant's complaint pursuant to the regulation

set forth at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be codified and

hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4)), for including

the same matter in her EEO complaint that was previously raised in a

negotiated grievance procedure.

On appeal, complainant states that she did file a grievance on October 15,

1997, but notes that her grievance was denied. Also, complainant argues

that since she filed the grievance prior to contacting an EEO Counselor,

her complaint should not be dismissed.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.301(a) states that when a person is

employed by an agency subject to 5 U.S.C. � 7121(d) and is covered by a

collective bargaining agreement that permits claims of discrimination to

be raised in a negotiated grievance procedure, a person wishing to file a

complaint or grievance on a matter of alleged employment discrimination

must elect to raise the matter under either Part 1614 or the negotiated

grievance procedure, but not both. The record shows that complainant

is covered by a collective bargaining agreement which allows issues

of discrimination to be raised pursuant to the negotiated grievance

procedure. In the present case, complainant filed a formal grievance

concerning a 1996 non-selection and an October 1997 non-selection.

On November 14, 1997 the agency rejected complainant's grievance.

Complainant also filed an EEO complaint on December 22, 1997, involving

the same two non-selections. The agency is required to dismiss a

complaint that was previously raised in a negotiated grievance procedures.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4). We therefore conclude that the agency

properly dismissed complainant's present complaint.

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss complainant's complaint

was proper and is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 19, 2000

____________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.