Archie Green, JR, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 4, 2009
0120090458 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 4, 2009)

0120090458

03-04-2009

Archie Green, JR, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Archie Green, JR,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120090458

Agency No. 4F900033508

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated October 8, 2008, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim. In a complaint dated September 20, 2008, complainant

alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal

(exonerated from sexual harassment charges) for prior protected EEO

activity under Title VII when: on April 24, 2008; June 19, 2008; and

September 12, 2008, he was not given the opportunity to be detailed as

a 204B (acting supervisor).

The record reflects that complainant has no prior EEO activity.

In fact, complainant is maintaining that solely because charges of sexual

harassment by another employee were "dropped" against him, he has been

denied an opportunity to be detailed as a 204B.

With regard to reprisal discrimination, the Commission has stated that:

The anti-reprisal provision of Title VII protects those who participate

in the EEO process and also those who oppose discriminatory employment

practices. Participation occurs when an employee has made a charge,

testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation,

proceeding or hearing. Participation also occurs when an employee files

a labor grievance, if the employee raised issues of unlawful employment

discrimination in the grievance. . . . A variety of activities has been

found to constitute opposition . . . . Because the enforcement of Title

VII depends on the willingness of employees to oppose unlawful employment

practices or policies, courts have interpreted section 704(a) of Title

VII as intending to provide 'exceptionally broad protection to those who

oppose such practices'. . . ." Whipple v. Department of Veterans Affairs,

EEOC Request No. 05910784 (February 21, 1992) (citations omitted).

Finally, we note that Title VII protects a person "where the employee

has a reasonable, good faith belief that the challenged employment

practice violates Title VII, even if the belief is later found to be

mistaken. . . . The mistaken belief may be one of law or of fact."

Whipple, supra, quoting Wolf v. J.I. Case Co., 617 F. Supp. 858, 868

(E.D. Wis. 1985).

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because he has not shown that he has prior EEO activity.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party. Failure to file within the time

period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration

as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely

filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted

with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider

requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very

limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__ March 4, 2009________________

Date

2

0120090458

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120090458