01a03630
09-27-2000
Anthony M. Caros v. Department of Justice 01A03630 September 27, 2000 . Anthony M. Caros, Complainant, v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.
Anthony M. Caros v. Department of Justice
01A03630
September 27, 2000
.
Anthony M. Caros,
Complainant,
v.
Janet Reno,
Attorney General,
Department of Justice,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A03630
Agency No. I-99-E114
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an agency
decision dated March 22, 2000, dismissing his complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.<1>
The record reveals that on June 14, 1999, complainant, a GS-9 employee,
filed a formal EEO complaint as a third party claiming that he was the
victim of unlawful employment discrimination on the basis of his sex
(male) when his supervisor stated to a co-worker that men are basically
worthless and cannot be relied upon to do anything right. In addition,
complainant states due to his supervisor's attitude towards men, he has
been denied a promotion to the GS-11 level in Toronto.
On March 22, 2000, the agency issued a final decision dismissing the
complaint. With regard to the alleged statement made by his supervisor,
the agency found that complainant was not an aggrieved employee and
therefore, this claim failed to state a claim. With respect to the
non-selection, the agency dismissed this claim on the grounds that
complainant failed to raise this issue with the EEO Counselor.
With respect to the alleged biased comment from complainant's supervisor,
the Commission finds that complainant has failed to show how he was
aggrieved by the comment. The Commission finds that this claim was
properly dismissed pursuant to the regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. �
1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. We note, however, that
this alleged comment may be raised as evidence of discriminatory animus
with regard to complainant's non-selection.
With regard to complainant's claim of non-selection, the Commission finds
that the agency incorrectly dismissed this claim for not raising it with
an EEO counselor. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) provides
that an agency shall dismiss a complaint which raises a matter that has
not been brought to the attention of an EEO Counselor, and is not like
or related to a matter on which the complainant has received counseling.
According to the EEO Counselor's report, complainant is claiming that his
supervisor has stated that men are so stupid and basically worthless, and
as a result of this attitude towards men, complainant's career progress
is being hindered. Therefore, complainant's claim that he was not
promoted to a GS-11 level position clarifies his original claim that his
supervisor's attitude towards men has hindered his career. Accordingly,
this claim is like or related to the claim for which complainant has
received EEO counseling and was improperly dismissed by the agency.
The agency's decision dismissing the claim with respect to the comment
is AFFIRMED. The agency's decision dismissing the non-selection claim is
REVERSED. The non-selection claim is REMANDED to the agency for further
processing in accordance with this decision and applicable regulations.
ORDER (E0800)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claim in accordance with
29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant
that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue
to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify
complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)
calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter
is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a
final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision
within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0800)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order
prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29
C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,
the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File
A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action
for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject
to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the
complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the
complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0800)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0400)
This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it
also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a
portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in
an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR
DAYS from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion
of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion
of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative
processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action AFTER
ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you filed your
complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until
such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.
If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE
COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD,
IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file
a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to
file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be
filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right
to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
September 27, 2000
__________________
Date
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply
to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the
administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply
the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.