Anthony Hopkins, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 4, 2003
01A22047 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 4, 2003)

01A22047

03-04-2003

Anthony Hopkins, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Anthony Hopkins v. United States Postal Service

01A22047

March 4, 2003

.

Anthony Hopkins,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A22047

Agency No. 4-G-730-0118-01

DECISION

Complainant timely initiated this appeal from the final agency decision

concerning his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The appeal is accepted pursuant

to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405. At all times relevant to the instant appeal,

complainant was employed as a Part Time Flexible (PTF) City Carrier at

the agency's post office in Spiro, Oklahoma. Complainant alleged in his

complaint that he was subjected to unlawful discrimination on the basis

of his sex, and in retaliation for prior participation in protected

equal employment opportunity (EEO) activity, when, on April 26, 2001,

the Postmaster from another post office subjected him to harassment and

required him to carry mail at the other post office.

In its final decision, the agency found no discrimination. The agency

noted in its decision that, in a letter dated August 24, 2001, it

notified complainant and his attorney of record of his right to request

a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge or, alternatively, to

receive a final decision by the agency without a hearing. The agency

further noted that complainant failed to respond to this notice, and,

therefore, it was issuing its final decision in the matter without a

hearing. Complainant, however, states in his appeal to the Commission

that he never received any correspondence from the agency pertaining to

its investigation of his complaint, including the investigative file,

and that he never received the aforementioned hearing request notice.

The Commission's regulations require that agencies timely complete their

investigation of discrimination complaints, and that they subsequently

provide the investigative file developed in that investigation to the

complainant. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108(f); EEOC Management Directive 110,

ch. 5, p. 28 (Nov. 9, 1999). The agency is also required to provide the

complainant with notice that, within thirty days of his or her receipt

of the investigative file, he or she has the right to request a hearing

and decision from an Administrative Judge, or, in the alternative, he or

she may request an immediate final decision from the agency with which

the complaint was filed. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108(g). If the complainant

fails to reply to this notice, the agency is required to take final

action by issuing a final decision. Id. � 1614.110(b).

Our review of the record on appeal reveals that, while the agency claims

to have conformed to the investigative file and hearing notice provisions

of our regulations, there is no evidence in the record in support of

these assertions. While the record on appeal includes certified mail

receipts from agency mailings to complainant during the counseling

stage of the EEO process, and certificates of service from the EEO

Investigator's mailing of affidavit requests to complainant, there is

no such similar evidence that the agency complied with our regulations

regarding providing the complainant a copy of the investigative file and

notice of the right to request a hearing. Therefore, we find that the

agency has failed to establish that it has satisfied its obligation to

provide complainant with the investigative file and notice of his right

to request a hearing before an Administrative Judge. Accordingly, it

is the decision of the Commission to VACATE the agency's final decision

in the matter, and to REMAND the matter to the agency to continue the

administrative processing of the complaint, as ordered below.

ORDER

The agency is ordered to continue the administrative processing of the

subject complaint as follows: within thirty (30) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final, the agency shall provide complainant

with a copy of the investigative file and notice of his right to request

a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge, as required pursuant to

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. Copies of the investigative file and the notice

provided to complainant must be submitted to the Compliance Officer,

as referenced below. The agency shall then continue the administrative

processing of the subject complaint, from the point of the agency's

provision to complainant of the investigative file and notice of his right

to request a hearing, pursuant to and consistent with the Commission's

regulations.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

�Right to File A Civil Action.� 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

�Agency� or �department� means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

(�Right to File A Civil Action�).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 4, 2003

Date