Anthony A. Smith, Jr., Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 1, 2003
01A31054_r (E.E.O.C. Dec. 1, 2003)

01A31054_r

12-01-2003

Anthony A. Smith, Jr., Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Anthony A. Smith, Jr. v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A31054

December 1, 2003

.

Anthony A. Smith, Jr.,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A31054

Agency No. 200O-0640-2002103699

DECISION

Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's November 26,

2002 decision dismissing complainant's complaint. Complainant alleges

discrimination on the bases of national origin, disability, race, color,

age and reprisal when, on October 19, 1998, he was removed from employment

as a VA Police Officer, GS-083-6. The agency dismissed complainant's

complaint for stating the same claim that is pending before or that

has been decided by the Commission or agency pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1). The agency also dismissed the complaint for untimely

EEO Counselor contact pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2).

Complainant first contacted an EEO Counselor on December 4, 1998,

regarding the October 19, 1998 removal. Although complainant subsequently

received a notice of right to file a formal complaint, including the

requisite time limit to file a formal complaint, on January 14, 1999,

he did not file his formal complaint at that time. On July 18, 2002,

complainant again contacted an EEO Counselor with regard to the same

matter. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's initial EEO

Counselor contact on December 4, 1998, was beyond the requisite time limit

after the October 19, 1998 incident, the effective date of his removal.

On appeal, complainant fails to present adequate justification to warrant

an extension of the applicable time limit for contacting an EEO Counselor.

The Commission also finds that complainant abandoned his complaint

from further processing when he did not file his complaint after his

receipt of a notice of final interview on January 14, 1999. On appeal,

complainant asserts that he did not file a formal complaint previously in

1999, because he "was awaiting responses from the various governmental

agencies that he had contacted with regards to this unfortunate matter.

Therefore, it was his belief, that inasmuch as the matter was in the

hands of other governmental agencies for review and consideration,

that upon receipt of their individual decision(s), that [he] would then

be able to file formally." However, the Commission finds that since

complainant clearly had a notice of the requisite time limit to file

his formal complaint, his contentions fail to warrant an extension of

the applicable time limit for filing the complaint. Furthermore, the

Commission notes that complainant's subsequent EEO contact on July 18,

2002, does not revive his already abandoned complaint.

Accordingly, the agency's decision is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 1, 2003

__________________

Date