Angela M. Nelson, Complainant,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 4, 2004
01A33129 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 4, 2004)

01A33129

03-04-2004

Angela M. Nelson, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Angela M. Nelson v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A33129

March 4, 2004

.

Angela M. Nelson,

Complainant,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A33129

Agency No. 200L-0502-2002100894

DECISION

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts the complainant's

appeal from the agency's final decision in the above-entitled matter.

Complainant alleged that the agency had subjected her to discrimination

and a hostile work environment on the basis of her race (Black), when:

(1) on her first day as a Registered Nurse, she was not greeted,

but was subjected to anger and hostility from a co-worker who loudly

snarled �who is going to orientate her?�;

her supervisor took two weeks leave after complainant had only been

there one week, and complainant did not receive proper orientation while

another newly employed nurse (N1) was walked through her orientation

and was treated with kindness and respect;

N1 was asked to sit up front and orientate with the Charge Nurse

while complainant was told to perform patient care duties and pass

out medications and treated in a manner as if she were too slow to

comprehend;

when complainant asked nurses to sign off on her orientation packet

she was told that they were too busy or they did not feel comfortable,

but complainant watched the same nurses sign N1's packet without even

asking what duties she performed. When complainant brought the matter

to the attention of her supervisor (RMO), she responded �they must feel

that you are not competent�;

complainant was often met with rude, hostile, unfriendly attitudes as

well as glaring looks;

on November 29, 2001, complainant met with RMO and during the meeting

RMO defamed her character and made untrue statements about her.

RMO was angry and hostile and mentioned complaints she had received

from several employees. Complainant was not given the opportunity to

respond to the allegations.

she was constructively discharged when, on December 3, 2001, she resigned

from the medical center due to the intolerable working conditions.<1>

After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration

of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to AFFIRM the agency's final

decision because the preponderance of the evidence of record does not

establish that race-based discrimination or harassment occurred. In so

finding, we note that, even assuming the challenged actions occurred as

complainant alleges, complainant has not established, by a preponderance

of the evidence, that they were motivated by race-based animus. We note

additionally, that the record fails to indicate that complainant's working

conditions were so intolerable as to render her resignation on December 3,

2001, a constructive discharge.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

March 4, 2004

______________________________ __________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director Date

Office of Federal Operations

1 The record indicates that complainant initially requested a hearing

before an Administrative Judge, but subsequently withdrew such request,

and the agency issued a final decision on the record.