05970437
01-20-1999
Angel M. Hyman, Appellant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
Angel M. Hyman v. Department of the Navy
05970437
January 20, 1999
Angel M. Hyman, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Request No. 05970437
) Appeal No. 01961649
Richard J. Danzig, ) Agency No. DON-95-00173-001
Secretary, )
Department of the Navy, )
Agency. )
)
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
On January 30, 1997, Angela M. Hyman (appellant) timely initiated
a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or
Commission) to reconsider the decision in Angela M. Hyman v. Department of
the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 01961649 (January 7, 1997). EEOC regulations
provide that the Commissioners may, in their discretion, reconsider
any previous Commission decision. 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party
requesting reconsideration must submit written argument or evidence
which tends to establish one or more of the following three criteria:
new and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1);
the previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation, or material fact, or misapplication of established
policy, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2); or the previous decision is of such
exceptional nature as to have substantial precedential implications,
29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3).
Upon review of appellant's request for reconsideration, the previous
decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that appellant's
request does not meet any of the criteria of 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c).<1>
Accordingly, it is the decision of the Commission to DENY appellant's
request for reconsideration. The decision in Appeal No. 01961649
remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further right
of administrative appeal from the decision of the Commission on this
request for reconsideration.
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0993)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of
administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right
to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court.
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from
the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil
action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY
(30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or
to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the
jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil
action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS
THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY
HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in
the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department
in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
JAN 20, 1999
Date Frances M. Hart
Executive Officer
Executive Secretariat
1 In her request for reconsideration, appellant argues that the agency
has discriminated against her subsequent to the events addressed in
the complaint at bar. Appellant is advised that any new allegation of
discrimination must be brought to the attention of an EEO Counselor,
as provided in 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(1).