AMFAC, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 15, 1968173 N.L.R.B. 850 (N.L.R.B. 1968) Copy Citation 850 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD AMFAC, Inc.' and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 1260 , AFL-CIO, Petitioner .2 Case 37-RC-1447 November 15, 1968 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION BY CHAIRMAN MCCULLOCH AND MEMBERS FANNING AND ZAGORIA Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before Bert M. Tomasu, Hearing Officer. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three- member panel. The Hearing Officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby af- firmed. Upon the entire record in this case, including the briefs filed by both parties, the Board finds: 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, and it will effectuate the purposes of the Act to assert jurisdiction herein. 2. The labor organization involved claims to repre- sent certain employees of the Employer. 3. A question affecting commerce exists con- cerning the representation of certain employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9(c)(1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act. 4. The Petitioner seeks to represent all warehouse employees of the Employer in the Machinery, Electri- cal and Appliance Department, including the Drug Department, at its Atkinson Park Warehouse,3 694 Auahi Street, Honolulu, Hawaii, excluding office clerical employees, confidential employees, profes- sional employees, guards and/or watchmen, and supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other employees.4 The Employer contends that the unit is too limited in scope; that an appropriate unit must include all employees employed in its wholesale operations in Honolulu, Hawaii, excluding employees in the Iweld and Appliance operations, office clerical employees, confidential employees, professional em- ployees, guards and/or watchmen, and supervisors as defined in the Act. The Employer, a diversified corporation having its principal office and place of business in Honolulu, Hawaii, is engaged in the production, sale and factoring of sugar; various wholesale and retail opera- tions; real estate development and management; agricultural consulting and management; and finance and mortgage activities. The employees engaged in the wholesale operations are located at three principal sites: the AP Warehouse, and warehouses located at Mapunapuna and Sand Island. The warehouse at Mapunapuna is 6 miles, and the warehouse at Sand Island is 5 miles, from the AP Warehouse. In American Factors, Ltd, 109 NLRB 834, the union sought a unit of all employees employed by the Employer at its AP Warehouse and the employees at the dry goods warehouse, or in the alternative, two units, one for the AP Warehouse, the other for the dry goods warehouse. The Board found that employ- ees at all four of the Employer's warehouses com- prised a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec- tive bargaining and directed an election for all employees at the Employer's AP Warehouse, dry goods and paper products warehouse, lumber yard or warehouse, and the glass warehouse. Since that time, the dry goods,warehouse has been abolished. The glass warehouse has been organized into a subsidiary company of the Employer and the employees have been separately organized. The appliance warehouse and service unit, which is part of the Mechanical, Electrical and Appliance Departments and located across the street from the AP Warehouse, is now under contract with the Petitioner. Otherwise, there is no history of collective bargaining for the Employer's employees. As the result of an administrative reorganization in 1967, the Wholesale Division, which formerly existed under one vice president, is no longer a part of the Employer's organizational structure. Hence, whereas prior to 1967 warehouse operations at all three warehouses were under the same vice president, the Mapunapuna and AP Warehouses are now under one vice president, and the Sand Island Warehouse is under a different vice president. The record indicates, however, that, otherwise, the warehouse operation has not substantially changed. The AP Warehouse, whose employees the Peti- tioner seeks to represent, is the headquarters for the M, E & A Department. It houses a variety of machinery and electrical equipment and also includes the inventory of the Drug Department which, because of its higher rate of inventory turnover, accounts for a greater part of the volume handled by the M, E & A Department at the AP Warehouse. The warehouse at Mapunapuna contains the industrial products section of the M, E & A Department, which includes the "DeRocher"6 inventory as well as trucks, forklifts, and other heavy machinery. The Sand Island facility, t The name of the Employer appears as amended at the hearing. 5 Herein referred to as M, E & A Department. 2 The name of the Petitioner appears as amended at the hearing . 6 This inventory includes heavy mobile industrial equipment, high 3 Herein referred to as AP Warehouse . pressure hose, brass fittings and fire extinguishers. 4 The unit sought appears as amended at the hearing. 173 NLRB No. 126 AMFAC, INC. 851 which is not a part of the M, E & A Department, serves as the headquarters for the Construction Materials Department and consists of a lumber yard and warehousing accommodations for hardware and construction materials. Employees in the AP Warehouse perform tasks essential to the movement of goods in and out of the warehouse. The warehousemen fill orders, package goods, and merchandise, and store them on shelves; the shipping and receiving clerks, and checkers, verify incoming merchandise against purchase orders and check outgoing merchandise against customer orders; the truckdrivers deliver merchandise to customers and at times may work inside the warehouse as ware- housemen; and section leaders are work leaders for small groups of warehousemen. Warehouse employees at the Sand Island facility are similarly categorized and perform essentially the same duties. However, warehousemen at Mapunapuna are not organized into specialized functions as they are at the AP and Sand Island Warehouses; they have no specific job classifi- cations. Most of the employees at Mapunapuna are in the Equipment Service Department. One half of the 14 employees in this department, though called "warehousemen", are mechanics, while the other half are mechanics helpers and painters. Only two ware- housemen at Mapunapuna perform warehousing duties exclusively, and they are employed in the DeRocher department. As indicated above, the M, E & A Department, which encompasses most of the functions and facili- ties of the Mapunapuna and the AP Warehouses, is under one departmental manager. However, super- vision of warehouse employees at each installation is separate; and warehouse employees in the Drug Department, a branch of the M, E & A Department at the AP Warehouse, are supervised separately. Despite their separate supervision, employees in the Drug Department work on the same floor as the other AP Warehouse employees and perform precisely the same warehousing tasks, except that they perform these tasks on drug supplies. As for personnel administration, all of the whole- sale warehouse employees have the same benefit plan, vacation time, holidays, sick leave, pensions, sever- ance pay, profit sharing, discount privileges, and a group life policy; and overtime pay is uniform for all warehouse employees. Hiring, payroll and accounting, and inventory are centrally administered. A seniority list of warehouse employees throughout the operation is referred to as vacancies occur at any of the three warehouses. Except for one mechanic who works at the AP Warehouse but is permanently assigned to the Mapunapuna Warehouse, transfer of employees on either a permanent or temporary basis is described by the Employer's Director of Industrial Relations as "very limited"; in fact, he was unable to give specific examples of such at the hearing. Most of the contact between employees is made by truckdrivers who transport merchandise between warehouses, and who take their vehicles when out of repair to another warehouse for parts and service. In cases involving retail chain store operations, the Board has revised somewhat its prior policy of finding that an appropriate unit must necessarily embrace all the employees within an employer's administrative or geographic area. In Sav-On Drugs, Inc., 138 NLRB 1032, 1033, we said that our "policy had over- emphasized the administrative grouping of merchan- dising outlets at the expense of factors such as geographic separation of the several outlets and the local managerial autonomy of the separate outlets; and it has ignored completely as a factor the extent to which the claiming labor organization had sought to organize the employees of the retail chain .... Therefore, whether a proposed unit which is con- fined to one or two or more retail establishments making up an employer's retail chain is appropriate will be determined in the light of all the circum- stances of the case." (Footnotes omitted.) We believe that the foregoing approach is also valid for warehouse operations. In cases subsequent to Sav-On Drugs, we found single store locations appro- priate unless countervailing factors were present.7 In the circumstances of this case, we find no counter- vailing factors and conclude that the policy we have adopted for retail chain store operations is applicable to the wholesale warehouse operation herein. The record in the instant case reveals that employ- ees at each warehouse are under separate immediate supervision. Transfer and interchange of employees between warehouses is very limited. All warehouse employees at the AP Warehouse, including employees in the Drug Department, have the same warehousing functions. On the other hand, M, E & A employees at Mapunapuna do not perform ordinary warehouse duties. In addition to being located 6 miles from the AP Warehouse, a substantial number of the warehouse employees at Mapunapuna are skilled at mechanics and do not perform warehousing duties exclusively. Further, we note that warehouse employees in the glass warehouse and the Appliance Service Center are separately represented. On the basis of these factors and the entire record, we conclude that the unit requested by the Petitioner, limited to employees at the AP Warehouse, is appropriate. We shall include the Drug Department employees in this unit, since Haag Drug Company, Incorporated , 169 NLRB No. 111 , Sun Drug Co., Inc., 147 NLRB 669, Primrose Super Market of Salem . Inc., 148 NLRB 610. 852 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD they are located in the AP Warehouse, and perform precisely the same warehousing functions as other employees at this location. Accordingly, we find that all warehouse employees of the Employer in the Machinery, Electrical and Appliance Department, including the Drug Depart- ment, at its Atkinson Park Warehouse at 694 Auahi Street, Honolulu, Hawaii, excluding cashiers and other office clerical employees, selling personnel, professional employees, guards and/or watchmen, and supervisors as defined in the Act, and employees presently covered in separate units by collective- bargaining agreements, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act.8 [Direction of Election9 omitted from publication.] 8 The parties are in substantial agreement as to the composition of the unit . Included are the following classifications of employees: warehousemen one, warehousemen two, shipping and receiving clerks, section leaders, checkers , and truckdrivers . The parties stipulated that Richardson , Luke, and H . Willing should be excluded as supervisors. 9 An election eligibility list, containing the names and addresses of all the eligible voters, must be filed by the Employer with the officer- m-Charge for Subregion 37 within 7 days after the date of issuance of this Direction of Election. The Officer-in-Charge shall make the list available to all parties to the election . No extension of time to file this list shall be granted by the Officer-in-Charge except in extraordinary circumstances . Failure to comply with this requirement shall be grounds for setting aside the election whenever proper objections are filed. Excelsior Underwear Inc., 156 NLRB 1236. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation