American Fixture and Manufacturing Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Mar 1, 1948

76 N.L.R.B. 444 (N.L.R.B. 1948)

In the Matter of AMERICAN FIXTURE AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
EMPLOYER and FURNITURE FINISHERS LOCAL UNION 980, A. F. L.,
PETITIONER
Case No. 14-R-1754.-Decided March 1, 1948
Messrs. E. J. Scheer and A. B. Frey, of St. Louis, Mo., for the
Employer.
Mr. G. W . Sisco, of St . Louis, Mo., for the Petitioner.
Messrs. W. C. Riley and Larry Connors , of St. Louis , Mo., for the
Intervenor.
Mr. Henry Weinrich , of St. Louis, Mo., for the Carpenters.
DECISION
AND
ORDER
Upon a, petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at St. Louis,
Missouri, on August 1, 1947, before Harry G. Carlson, hearing officer.
The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from preju-
dicial error and are hereby affirmed.
Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations
Board 1 makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER
American Fixture and Manufacturing Company, a Missouri corpo-
ration, is engaged in the manufacture of display store fixtures at its
two plants at Locust Street and at Semple Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri.
The Employer's annual purchases of raw materials exceed $1,000,000,
of which approximately 75 percent represents shipments from outside
the State. Its annual sales of finished products exceed $1,000,000, of
which approximately 75 percent represents shipments to points outside
the State.
1 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the
Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-man panel consist-
ing of the undersigned Board Members [Houston, Murdock, and Gray]
76 N. L. R. B., No. 63.
444
AMERICAN FIXTURE AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY 445
The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce
within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with the American
Federation of Labor, claiming to represent employees of the Em-
ployer.
International Association of Machinists, herein called the Inter-
venor, is a labor organization, claiming to represent employees of the
Employer.
Carpenters District Council of St. Louis, Missouri, herein called
the Carpenters, is a labor organization affiliated with the American
Federation of Labor, claiming to represent employees of the Em-
ployer.
III. THE ALLEGED QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION; THE ALLEGED
APPROPRIATE UNIT
The Petitioner seeks a unit composed of "all painters, fillers and
sanders employed at both the Semple Avenue and Locust Street
plants." 2 These employees have been represented for a period of 10
years by the Intervenor, which is one of a group of five unions 3 with
which the Employer had a joint contract at the time the petition was
filed,
The Employer and the Intervenor contend that the unit sought by the
Petitioner is inappropriate. The employees in the unit sought are
not segregated, work under foremen who supervise other operations,
and do various kinds of work in departments throughout the plant
under different foremen. There are no employees who do painting
or sanding only, and no employees classified as fillers are employed
by the Employer. The employees in question receive about the same
wage rates as do other production employees. The painters possess
no high degree of skill, 4 months being the maximum period to work
up to a journeyman painter's wage. The number of employees within
the other two classifications described in the unit is the subject of
an unresolved dispute between the Petitioner and the Employer, the
former claiming there are only 31, the latter that because of the
2 The description of the unit was amended three times during the hearing, but was finally
restored to read as in the petition
3 The other unions are metal Polishers, Platers and Helpers International Union No. 13,
A F L , Upholsterers International Union, Local No 25, A F. L. ; The Carpenters ; Inter-
national Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No 1, A F. L. All five unions have
dealt jointly with the Employer for the past 6 years, the first four for the past 10 years.
There has been no Board determination as to the appropriate units at these plants.
4 The petition was filed timely, and the contract is therefore not a bar.
446 DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
constant interchange of painters and other employees, the description
would include over 200.5 Under these circumstances, we find that
the unit requested by the Petitioner is undefinable, incohesive, and
therefore inappropriate.
Inasmuch as we have held that the bargaining unit sought by the
Petitioner is inappropriate for collective bargaining purposes, we
find that no question affecting commerce exists concerning the repre-
sentation of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section
9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations
Act. We shall, therefore, dismiss the petition.
ORDER
Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact, and upon the
entire record in these proceedings, the National Labor Relations Board
hereby orders that the petition for investigation and certification of
representatives of employees of American Fixture and Manufacturing
Company, St. Louis, Missouri, filed herein by Furniture Finishers
Local Union 980, A. F. L., be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
6 After the first amendment , and after numerous other attempts by the Petitioner more
specifically to define the unit, the hearing officer addressed the Petitioner as follows "Well,
what we are interested in is who and where these people are " The entire answer of the
Petitioner was . "They might be any place in the plant, they work all over the plant like a
machinist does and the electricians and anyone , they seem to work in a half a dozen depart-
ments, I don 't know, I wasn't in the plant , I couldn ' t answer that question "