Alfredo F. Fernandez, Complainant,v.Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 8, 2009
0120082736 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 8, 2009)

0120082736

07-08-2009

Alfredo F. Fernandez, Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Alfredo F. Fernandez,

Complainant,

v.

Ray Mabus,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120082736

Agency No. 06-55630-01589

DECISION

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission concerning his

complaint of unlawful employment discrimination. Complainant alleged

discrimination based on sex (male), age (over 40), and in reprisal for

prior EEO activity when on April 11, 2006, he was not selected for the

position of Supply System Analyst, GS-2003-09/11, under Certificate

SW6-GS-2003-09-P5279583-RDL. After completion of the investigation of

the complaint, complainant did not request a hearing. The agency then

issued its May 7, 2008 decision concluding that it asserted legitimate,

nondiscriminatory reasons for its action, which complainant failed to

rebut.

Initially, we note that complainant also alleged that in November 2004,

he was not afforded the opportunity to attend "Air Speed" training.

Upon review, we find that the agency properly dismissed this claim due to

untimely EEO Counselor contact, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2).

After a review of the record, we find that complainant should have

reasonably suspected discrimination at the time of alleged incident

in November 2004, but he did not contact an EEO Counselor until May

18, 2006, which was beyond the 45-day limitation period. On appeal,

complainant presents no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an

extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact with

regard to this claim.

With regard to the alleged nonselection, we find that the agency

articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its selection

decision. The Selecting Official (SO) stated that complainant's

knowledge, skills, and abilities were inferior to the selectee.

Specifically, the SO asserted that the selectee had a strong resume

indicating Air Speed training, strong work ethics, taking initiative,

self-starters and being able to work independently. The SO also stated

that complainant lacked the foregoing factors and he had difficulty with

self-expression and avoided volunteering to work on new programs.

The Commission finds that complainant failed to rebut the agency's

articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for the selection

decision. Furthermore, complainant failed to show that his qualifications

for the Supply System Analysis position at issue were plainly superior to

the selectee's qualifications, or that the agency's action was motivated

by any discrimination.

Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing the November 2004 incident

and finding no discrimination concerning the alleged nonselection is

AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court

that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court

also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs,

or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as

amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request

is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an

attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file

a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed

within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File

A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 8, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120082736

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

4

0120082736