Alfred R. Randon, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 30, 2009
0520090580 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 30, 2009)

0520090580

10-30-2009

Alfred R. Randon, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Pacific Area), Agency.


Alfred R. Randon,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Pacific Area),

Agency.

Request No. 0520090580

Appeal No. 0120080465

Hearing No. 540-2007-00037X

Agency No. 4F-852-0119-06

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Alfred

R. Randon v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120080465 (June

9, 2009). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its

discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision

where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

(2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In his underlying complaint, complainant alleged that he was discriminated

against based on his race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., with regard to

his work assignment and discipline issued by the agency. In Randon

v. U.S. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120080465, the Commission

affirmed the agency's final agency decision (FAD) adopting an EEOC

Administrative Judge's decision issued without a hearing. The AJ

concluded that complainant failed to establish that he was subjected to

discrimination as he alleged.

In his request for reconsideration, complainant reiterates arguments

which were raised and considered below. We note that a "request for

reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission." Equal

Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614

(EEO MD-110), 9-17 (November 9, 1999). After reconsidering the previous

decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request

fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny the request. Complainant failed

to present any argument or evidence that would establish that the

prior decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material

fact or law. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120080465 remains the

Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 30, 2009

Date

2

0520090580

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0520090580