Agency.Download PDFEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 16, 20180220170002 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 16, 2018) Copy Citation U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Zachary K.,1 Grievant, v. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary, Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration), Agency. Appeal No. 0220170002 Agency No. GREV201602127 DECISION Grievant filed an appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) from the Agency’s decision entitled Grievance Decision, Step 2 dated December 23, 2016, concerning his union grievance alleging unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) et seq. At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Grievant worked as an I-Band level Attorney at the Agency’s National Enforcement Practice located in the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. On August 31, 2016, Grievant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of sex (male) when, he was denied a promotion to the J band on July 8, 2016. The Agency issued its Step 1 grievance decision on December 1, 2016, denying the grievance on the basis that it was untimely filed. In the alternative, the Agency determined that Grievant had also filed an appeal on the same matter with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), which precluded him from also pursuing the instant grievance. 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Grievant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 0220170002 2 Finally, the Agency found that Grievant was unclear as to the basis for his allegations and that he failed to provide evidence and explanations giving rise to his alleged violation of Title VII. Grievant, with the assistance of his union, pursued a Step 2 grievance. On December 23, 2016, the Agency issued its Step 2 decision, again denying the grievance. The decision reaffirmed the determination that the Grievant’s grievance was filed in an untimely manner. The Step 2 decision also found that Grievant raised the same matter before the MSPB and that the grievance should be denied. Therefore, the Agency Step 2 decision reaffirmed the Step 1 decision and denied the grievance again. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. 1614.401(d) provides that a grievant may appeal to the Commission from a final decision of the agency, an arbitrator or the Federal Labor Relations Authority on a grievance when an issue of employment discrimination was raised in a negotiated grievance procedure that permits such issues to be raised. As set forth above, the Agency found that under the terms of the negotiated grievance procedure, the grievance was untimely filed. The Commission has consistently found that it does not have jurisdiction to review procedural determinations by an agency solely related to the grievance process and the collective bargaining agreement. Reese v. Dep’t of Agriculture, EEOC Appeal No. 02970023 (October 3, 2000); Johnson v. Equal Employment Opp. Comm., EEOC Appeal No. 02900040 (March 20, 1991). Accordingly, Grievant’s appeal is DISMISSED. STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL RECONSIDERATION (M0617) The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Grievant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that: 1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or 2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration in which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 § VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Grievant’s request may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. 0220170002 3 In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The agency’s request must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC’s Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party. Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c). GRIEVANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610) You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Grievant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations November 16, 2018 Date Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation