Acie Lyons, Petitioner,v.Dr. James B. Peake, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 27, 2008
0320080087 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 27, 2008)

0320080087

08-27-2008

Acie Lyons, Petitioner, v. Dr. James B. Peake, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Acie Lyons,

Petitioner,

v.

Dr. James B. Peake,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Petition No. 0320080087

MSPB No. PH0752070365I1

DECISION

Petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission asking for review of a Final Order issued by the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning his claim of discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as

amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation

Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

Petitioner filed an appeal with the MSPB alleging that he was

discriminated against on the bases of disability (back) and reprisal for

prior protected EEO activity when he was removed from his position with

the agency as a Sewing Machine Operator, WG-03. On May 5, 2006, agency

management proposed petitioner's removal based on the charge of inability

to maintain a regular work schedule since June 2005 and because his most

recent medical documentation indicated an inability to perform the duties

of his position. Following petitioner's response to the proposal, the

agency issued a decision removing petitioner effective August 11, 2006.

Petitioner appealed the removal decision to the MSPB.

Briefly, petitioner sustained a work-related injury to his back in

September 2003 and was eventually approved for workers' compensation

benefits. The Department of Labor's Office of Workers' Compensation

Programs (OWCP) terminated petitioner's benefits in 2005, when it

determined that he had recovered from his injury. The agency initially

approved 432 hours of leave without pay for petitioner, and then ordered

him to return to work, warning him that failure to do so could result

in an adverse action. Petitioner asserted that he was not physically

able to perform the duties of his position and did not return to work.

The agency placed him in an absent without official leave (AWOL) status

and later proposed his removal.

A hearing was held on the matter, and thereafter a MSPB Administrative

Judge (AJ) issued an initial decision upholding the removal, finding

no discrimination or reprisal. The AJ determined that, even assuming

petitioner had a disability,1 he did not show that he could perform

the essential functions of his sewing machine operator position, with

or without reasonable accommodation. In addition, the AJ noted that

there were no positions to which petitioner could be reassigned for

which he qualified. Further, to the extent that petitioner desired to

continue doing the light duty tasks he had performed under the workers'

compensation program, the AJ found that the agency did not have a

responsibility under the Rehabilitation Act to provide "make work"

to petitioner. Rather, its reassignment duty was limited to searching

for vacant positions for which petitioner qualified. As already noted,

the AJ determined the evidence of record did not establish that such a

position was available. As to petitioner's claim of reprisal, the AJ

found that petitioner failed to show any nexus between his protected

activity and the agency's actions.

Petitioner sought review of the AJ's decision by the full Board, but the

Board denied his request. Petitioner then filed the instant petition.

EEOC regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes

determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303

et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of the

MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes a

correct interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy

directive, and is supported by the evidence in the record as a whole.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c).

Based upon a thorough review of the record, it is the decision of the

Commission to concur with the final decision of the MSPB finding no

discrimination. The Commission finds that the MSPB's decision constitutes

a correct interpretation of the laws, rules, regulations, and policies

governing this matter and is supported by the evidence in the record as

a whole.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 27, 2008

_________________

Date

1 The Commission assumes, for purposes of this decision, that petitioner

is a person with a disability. 29 C.F.R. � 1630.2(g).

??

??

??

??

2

0320080087

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0320080087