01991120
04-14-2000
A. Veronica Gray, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
A. Veronica Gray, )
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01991120
) Agency No. 4B-060-0224-98
William J. Henderson, )
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
Agency. )
____________________________________)
DECISION
On November 23, 1998, complainant filed a timely appeal with this
Commission from a final agency decision (FAD), pertaining to her complaint
of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.,
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29
U.S.C. � 621 et seq., and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.<1> For the reasons that follow,
the FAD is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED in part.
In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to
discrimination on the bases of sex, age, and disability when:
in January 1997, her supervisor took away two of her customer service
hours;
in the winter of 1998, her supervisor failed to investigate an incident
regarding a pine cone being left in her chair; and
on August 10, 1998 her supervisor did not allow her to leave the work
area to take medication and threatened her with being absent with leave
(AWOL).
The agency dismissed claims (1) and (2) pursuant to Volume 64
Fed. Reg. 37, 644, 37, 656 (1999)(to be codified and hereinafter cited as
29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2)) for failing to timely initiate contact with
an EEO Counselor. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's
August 10, 1998 EEO counselor contact regarding claims (1) and (2)
was untimely. It is the decision of this Commission that complainant
should have reasonably suspected discrimination regarding her claims
more than 45 days prior to her initial contact of an EEO Counselor.
Complainant has not presented persuasive evidence on appeal to justify
the extension of the applicable time limits for seeking counseling
regarding claims (1) and (2). The agency's decision dismissing claims
(1) and (2) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) is AFFIRMED.
The FAD dismissed claim (3) pursuant to Volume 64 Fed. Reg. 37, 644,
37, 656, (1999)(to be codified and hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. �
1614.107(a)(1)), for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the agency
found that complainant failed to demonstrate that she was aggrieved by
her supervisor's refusal to allow her to leave the work room floor to
take her medication and threat of AWOL if she did leave.
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)) provides, in relevant part,
that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim.
An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee
or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been
discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,
.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined
an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with
respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which
there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request
No. 05931049 (April 22, 1994).
The only proper questions in determining whether a claim is within
the purview of the EEO process are (1) whether the complainant is
an aggrieved employee and (2) whether she has alleged employment
discrimination covered by the EEO statutes. An employee is �aggrieved�
if she has suffered direct and personal deprivation at the hands of the
employer. See Hobson v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05891133
(March 2, 1990). In claim (3), complainant claims that management
refused to allow her to leave the work room floor to take medication,
and that she was threatened with disciplinary action if she did leave.
Complainant's claim is sufficient to render her an aggrieved employee.
Because she has alleged that the adverse action was based on sex, age,
and disability, she has raised a claim within the purview of the EEOC
regulations.
The agency's decision to dismiss claim (3) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �
1614.107(a)(2) is REVERSED. The claim is REMANDED to the agency for
processing in accordance with this decision and applicable regulations.
ORDER (E0400)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claim (claim 3) in
accordance with 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999) (to be codified
and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108). The agency shall
acknowledge to the complainant that it has received the remanded claim
within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final.
The agency shall issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and
also shall notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred
fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless
the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant
requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a
final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the
complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,
the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.
29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a
civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior
to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �
1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a
civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph
below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407
and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the
underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �
2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action, the
administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for
enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)
(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must
also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0400)
This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it
also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a
portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in
an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR
DAYS from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion
of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion
of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative
processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action AFTER
ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you filed your
complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until
such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.
If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE
COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD,
IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file
a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole
discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not
extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and
the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the
paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
April 14, 2000
Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that
the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
_______________ ____________________________
Date 1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's
federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations
apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in
the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply
the revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where
applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended,
may also be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.