A. Siegel & Sons

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Dec 19, 1952

101 N.L.R.B. 1257 (N.L.R.B. 1952)

AUSTIN COMPANY 1257
A. SIEGEL & SONS and LOCAL 80-A, PACKINGHOUSE WORKERS, CIO,
PETITIONER . Case No. 4-RC-1636. December 19,1952
Order
On November 21, 1952, following the conviction of Anthony Valen-
tino, in a United States district court, for having previously made
false statements in a non-Communist affidavit filed with the Board
under Section 9 (h) of the Act, the Board issued and sent to all parties
a notice to show cause, returnable on or before December 1, 1952,
why its certification of August 11, 1952, issued in the above-entitled
proceeding, should not be revoked for abuse of its processes.
Upon request of the Union, an enlargement of time in which to
answer was granted to all parties. The Union filed a brief in response
and requested opportunity to be heard and to present the facts and the
position of the Union to the Board. Pursuant to notice to all parties,
the Board heard oral argument on December 16,1952. The Union and
the C. I. 0., which was permitted to intervene and file a brief, partici-
pated in the argument. The A. F. of L. was permitted to, and did,
file a brief. The Employer did not reply or participate in the
argument.
The Board having duly considered the response, briefs, and argu-
ments, concludes that, in the interest of protecting its own processes
from further abuse, its certification of August 11, 1952, should be con-
sidered of no further force and effect.
Now THEREFORE said certification is adjudged and declared to be of
no further force and effect.
By direction of the Board :
OGDEN W. FIELDS,
Executive Secretary.
i Member Hou8ton did not participate in this matter because of his absence from official
duty due to illness.
101 NLRB No. 228.
AUSTIN COMPANY and Louis C. LINKER
LABORERS AND HOD CARRIERS UNION LOCAL No. 300 and Louis C.
LINKER . Cases Nos. 21-CA-1037 and 21-CB-335. December 22,
1952
Decision and Order
On February 4, 1952, Trial Examiner Wallace E. Royster issued
his Intermediate Report in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that
each of the Respondents had engaged in and was engaging in certain
unfair labor practices, and recommending that each of them cease and
101 NLRB No. 197.