_____________________, Complainant,v.Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, (Food and Drug Administration) Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 25, 2011
0120113204 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 25, 2011)

0120113204

11-25-2011

_____________________, Complainant, v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, (Food and Drug Administration) Agency.




_____________________,

Complainant,

v.

Kathleen Sebelius,

Secretary,

Department of Health and Human Services,

(Food and Drug Administration)

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120113204

Agency No. HHSFDACDER04111F

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated May 17, 2011, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Senior Medical Analyst at the Agency’s Center for Drugs and

Evaluation facility in Silver Spring, Maryland. He was first hired in

January 2009, and a year later transferred to the Division of Metabolism

and Endocrinology Products (DMEP) where the events at issue arose.

On February 17, 2011, Complainant initiated EEO counseling and, on

April 18, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the

Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of sex (male) when:

(1) his supervisor, the DMEP Deputy Director, did not provide him with

comparable training, guidance, instruction and access to meet with him

as that provided to female colleagues, and (2) he was terminated from

his position effective December 22, 2010.1

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact. The instant appeal

followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints

of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date

of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel

action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

The time limit to seek EEO counseling shall be extended when an individual

shows he was not notified of the time limit and was not otherwise aware

of it. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(2).

In this case, Complainant asserts that he had no knowledge of his right

to file an EEO complaint over his termination, much less the applicable

time limitations. He states he learned about his rights from a friend,

and initiated contact with the EEO office on the same day as he learned

of its existence.

It is the Commission's policy that constructive knowledge of the time

limit will be imputed to an employee when an employer has fulfilled its

obligation of informing employees of their rights and obligations under

EEOC's regulations. Thompson v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request

No. 05910474 (Sept. 12, 1991). The Agency has the burden of producing

sufficient evidence to show it fulfilled its duty of conspicuously

posting EEO information or that it otherwise notified Complainant of

his rights. An example of such proof is an affidavit by an EEO official

stating that that there were unobstructed posters with EEO information,

including the 45-day time limit to contact an EEO counselor, posted in

the facility where Complainant worked and identifying the periods of

posting accompanied by a copy of the poster. As well, an agency can

provide documentation that the complainant took EEO training where the

45-day time limit was covered. However, in the instant case, no such

evidence has been provided by the Agency. Therefore, Complainant’s

assertions that he had no knowledge of the applicable limitation period

remains unrebutted and his less than two week delay in contacting a

counselor is excused.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is REVERSED and the complaint is REMANDED to the Agency for

further processing in accordance with the following Order.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108 et seq. The Agency shall acknowledge to the

Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall

issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall

notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty

(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the

matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue

a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant’s

request.

A copy of the Agency’s letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC

20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and

the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the

Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File A Civil

Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

“Agency” or “department” means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 25, 2011

__________________

Date

1 In its dismissal decision, the Agency indicates Complainant also

raised religion as a basis of the alleged discrimination. However, an

examination of the formal complaint and related EEO counseling materials

reveals no indication that Complainant intended to raise religion as a

basis of his claim of discrimination.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120113204

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120113204