Summary
In Zemel, after ruling that estoppel applied to the plaintiffs' claims, the Court considered, and rejected, the plaintiffs' argument that factual issues existed as to whether Horowitz fraudulently induced them to report the transaction for tax purposes as they did.
Summary of this case from Mahoney-Buntzman v. BuntzmanOpinion
March 2, 2006.
Estoppel — Judicial Estoppel.