Summary
stating that the presumption under HRS § 386-85 applies only to determine the work-relatedness of an injury, while the substantial evidence required under HRS § 386-89(c) applies to a determination of whether there has been a change in or a mistake made in relation to the claimant's physical condition
Summary of this case from Porter v. Queen's Med. Ctr.Opinion
No. CAAP–10–0000200.
2013-11-22
Edward SMITH, Claimant–Appellant, v. Sueji KANEMOTO, and First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd., Employer/Insurance Carrier–Appellees.
Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (Case No. AB 2008–423(M) (7–78–00428)). Edward Smith, for Claimant–Appellant pro se. Leighton K. Oshima, Darlene Y.F. Itomura (Wong & Oshima), on the briefs, for Employer/Insurance Carrier–Appellees.