From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gliatta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2006
27 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-00225.

March 7, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), dated December 17, 2003, which designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Bruce D. Townsend, Walden, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Ritter, Krausman and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant, represented by counsel, consented to his designation as a level three sex offender and waived his right to a hearing on the matter ( see Correction Law § 168-n). The defendant's contentions regarding the validity of his waiver are unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Dexter, 21 AD3d 403, lv denied 5 NY3d 716). In any event, we are satisfied that the waiver was knowingly and voluntarily given ( see People v. Dexter, supra).

The defendant's remaining contentions are waived, unpreserved for appellate review, based on matters dehors the record, or without merit ( see People v. Kinchen, 60 NY2d 772; People v. Spotards, 23 AD3d 586; People v. Dexter, supra; People v. Angelo, 3 AD3d 482; People v. Tilley, 305 AD2d 1041; People v. Baker, 303 AD2d 570).


Summaries of

People v. Gliatta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2006
27 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Gliatta

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEONARD P. GLIATTA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 7, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1598
810 N.Y.S.2d 342

Citing Cases

People v. Wiedeman

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The defendant's contention that the…

People v. Smith

Defendant contends that his waiver of a hearing and consent to being adjudicated a risk level III sex…