From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Angelo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 12, 2004
3 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-08571.

Decided January 12, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Orange County (Kiedasch, J.), dated May 24, 2002, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Kevin Walsh, Goshen, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Catherine A. Walsh of counsel), for respondent.

Before: THOMAS A. ADAMS and BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant's claim that the County Court erred in designating him a level three sex offender is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not object to the designation on the grounds he now raises ( see People v. Baker, 303 A.D.2d 570). In any event, his contentions are without merit as the order was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Correction Law § 168-n).

RITTER, J.P., S. MILLER, ADAMS and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Angelo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 12, 2004
3 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Angelo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ETC., respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 12, 2004

Citations

3 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
769 N.Y.S.2d 753

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The defendant's contention that the…

People v. Rogers

Although the People failed to provide the defendant with timely notice of this evidence as required by…