From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Spotards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2005
23 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-01918.

November 21, 2005.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered January 13, 2004, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Gary E. Eisenberg, Monroe, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the validity of his plea is unpreserved for appellate review since it was not raised in the County Court ( see People v. Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 905; People v. Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637; People v. Coles, 240 AD2d 419). In any event, the defendant's claim that his plea was not knowing, voluntarily, and intelligent because it resulted from his counsel's failure to advise him that he would be sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender cannot be reviewed on direct appeal since it is based on matter which is dehors the record ( see People v. Reels, 17 AD3d 488, 489; People v. Villacreses, 12 AD3d 624, 626). The defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is likewise based on matter which is dehors the record and, thus, cannot be reviewed on direct appeal ( see People v. Reels, supra; People v. Villacreses, supra).


Summaries of

People v. Spotards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2005
23 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Spotards

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD SPOTARDS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2005

Citations

23 A.D.3d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 9018
804 N.Y.S.3d 264

Citing Cases

State v. Wilson

The defendant's contentions that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, or intelligently made, and that he…

People v. Whitaker

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that his plea was coerced is unpreserved…