holding that the Medical Board's summary denial of petitioner's application for ADR benefits was arbitrary and capricious
Summary of this case from In re Appl. of Athanassiou v. KellyNo. 101457/2007.
October 2, 2007.
Civil Service — Retirement and Pension Benefits — Accidental Disability Retirement.
holding that the Medical Board's summary denial of petitioner's application for ADR benefits was arbitrary and capricious
Summary of this case from In re Appl. of Athanassiou v. Kellyholding that the Medical Board's summary denial of petitioner's application for ADR benefits based on his PTSD resulting from his assignment at the WTC site was arbitrary and capricious
Summary of this case from In re Appl. of Morales v. Kellyholding that the Medical Board's summary denial of petitioner's application for ADR benefits based on his PTSD resulting from his assignment at the WTC site was arbitrary and capricious
Summary of this case from IN RE BRADY v. BD OF TR OF NYC POLICE PENSION FUNDFull title:McAdams, Matter of, v. Kelly
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Date published: Oct 2, 2007
While respondents also argue that the Medical Board's own assessment found Brady's mental status examination…
IN MATTER OF LOUD v. KELLYHowever, courts have annulled and remanded for further review determinations of the Medical Board and the…