Summary
establishing maximum imprisonment term of ten years
Summary of this case from U.S. v. DwinellsOpinion
No. 104104.
June 11, 1996.
Leave to Appeal Denied June 11, 1996:
reported below: 211 Mich. App. 321.
We would grant leave to appeal.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hatfield v. ST Mary's Medical Center
Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 11, 1996
549 N.W.2d 538 (Mich. 1996)
Summaries of
Hatfield v. ST Mary's Medical Center
Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 11, 1996
549 N.W.2d 538 (Mich. 1996)
establishing maximum imprisonment term of ten years
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Dwinellsenacting S. 652
Summary of this case from Texas Office, Public Utility Counsel v. FC.Cestablishing maximum imprisonment term of ten years
Summary of this case from United States v. Shillamending the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.
Summary of this case from Bellsouth Telecommunications v. Ga. Public Svc. Commstating that, "Within 180 days after the enactment of [the Telecommunications Act of 1996], the [FCC] shall complete action in ET Docket 93-62 to prescribe and make effective rules regarding the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions"
Summary of this case from In re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency EmissionsCase details for
Hatfield v. ST Mary's Medical Center
Case Details
Full title:HATFIELD v. ST MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER
Court:Supreme Court of Michigan
Date published: Jun 11, 1996
Citations
549 N.W.2d 538 (Mich. 1996)
451 Mich. 922
Citing Cases
Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. v. U.S.
Pub.L. No. 104-104, § 561(a), 110 Stat. 56, 142 (1996). Section 2284 requires that at least one of the judges…
Chicago v. Comcast Cable HoldingsThe 5% cap on franchise fees remained intact but the 1996 Act limited the collection of franchise fees to a…