Section 49.49 - Medical assistance offenses(1d) DAMAGES. If any person is convicted under s. 946.91 (2), the state shall have a cause of action for relief against such person in an amount 3 times the amount of actual damages sustained as a result of any excess payments made in connection with the offense for which the conviction was obtained. Proof by the state of a conviction under s. 946.91 (2) in a civil action shall be conclusive regarding the state's right to damages and the only issue in controversy shall be the amount, if any, of the actual damages sustained. Actual damages shall consist of the total amount of excess payments, any part of which is paid by state funds. In any such civil action the state may elect to file a motion in expedition of the action. Upon receipt of the motion, the presiding judge shall expedite the action.(3p) PROHIBITED PROVIDER CHARGES. No provider may knowingly violate s. 609.91 (2).(4m) PROHIBITED CONDUCT; FORFEITURES. (a) No person, in connection with medical assistance, may:1. Knowingly make or cause to be made any false statement or representation of a material fact in any application for a benefit or payment.2. Knowingly make or cause to be made any false statement or representation of a material fact for use in determining rights to a benefit or payment.3. Knowingly conceal or fail to disclose any event of which the person has knowledge that affects his or her initial or continued right to a benefit or payment or affects the initial or continued right to a benefit or payment of any other person in whose behalf he or she has applied for or is receiving a benefit or payment.(b) A person who violates this subsection may be required to forfeit not less than $100 nor more than $15,000 for each statement, representation, concealment or failure.(5) COUNTY COLLECTION. Any county may retain 15 percent of state Medical Assistance funds that are recovered due to the efforts of a county employee or officer or, if the county initiates action by the department of justice, due to the efforts of the department of justice under s. 49.846. This subsection applies only to recovery of medical assistance that was provided as a result of fraudulent activity by a recipient or by a provider.(6) RECOVERY. In addition to other remedies available under this section, the court may award the department of justice the reasonable and necessary costs of investigation, an amount reasonably necessary to remedy the harmful effects of the violation and the reasonable and necessary expenses of prosecution, including attorney fees, from any person who violates this section. The department of justice shall deposit in the state treasury for deposit in the general fund all moneys that the court awards to the department or the state under this subsection. The costs of investigation and the expenses of prosecution, including attorney fees, shall be credited to the appropriation account under s. 20.455 (1) (gh).(7) OPERATION OF NURSING HOME OR INTERMEDIATE CARE FACILITY BY COMMISSION NOT PROHIBITED. (a) In this subsection: 1. "Commission" means an entity that is created by contract between 2 or more political subdivisions under s. 66.0301 to operate a nursing home or intermediate care facility and to which all of the following apply: a. The entity is the named licensee for the nursing home or intermediate care facility.b. The entity is the certified provider under s. 49.45 (2) (a) 11. for the nursing home or intermediate care facility and is the recipient of medical assistance reimbursement for services provided by the nursing home or intermediate care facility.c. The entity owns or leases the building in which the nursing home or intermediate care facility is located.d. The entity provides or contracts for provision of nursing home or intermediate care facility services.e. The entity controls admissions and discharges from the nursing home or intermediate care facility.f. The entity allocates the costs of operating the nursing home or intermediate care facility, and of providing services to residents of the nursing home or intermediate care facility, among the political subdivisions that are parties to the contract and assesses each political subdivision that is a party to the contract the portion of the costs allocated to that political subdivision.2. "Member" means a political subdivision that is a party to a contract to create a commission.3. "Political subdivision" means a county, city, village, or town.(b) A commission's imposition of an assessment on a member for the costs incurred by the commission to operate the nursing home or intermediate care facility and to provide services to residents of the nursing home or intermediate care facility is a charge internal to the commission and does not constitute billing a 3rd party for services provided on behalf of an individual.(c) A member's payment of an assessment described under par. (b) is a transfer of funds internal to the commission and does not constitute a purchase of services on behalf of an individual, regardless of whether the payment is made from the member's general fund, made pursuant to a purchase of services agreement between a member's human services department or other department and the commission, or by a combination of these payment methods.(d) A commission's imposition of an assessment described under par. (b), a member's payment of the assessment as described under par. (c), and acceptance of the payment by the commission do not constitute conduct prohibited under s. 946.91 (6) or prohibited under s. DHS 106.04 (3), Wis. Adm. Code, in effect on May 26, 2010. It is the intent of the legislature to create a mechanism whereby 2 or more political subdivisions may share in the operation, use, and funding of a nursing home or intermediate care facility without violating 42 USC 1320a-7b (d) or 42 USC 1396a (a) (25) (C).Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 29, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 28, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 27, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 26, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 25, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 24, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 22, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 21, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 20, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 19, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 18, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 17, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 16, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 15, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 14, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 13, eff. 4/10/2014.Amended by Acts 2013 ch, 226,s 12, eff. 4/10/2014.1977 c. 418; 1979 c. 89; 1981 c. 317; 1985 a. 29 s. 3202 (23); 1985 a. 269; 1989 a. 23, 31; 1995 a. 27; 1997 a. 283; 2001 a. 109; 2003 a. 309; 2007 a. 20; 2009 a. 283. The only state of mind requirement for a violation of sub. (1) (a) 1. is the intentional making or causing the making of a false statement that appears in an application; that anyone actually received a medical assistance benefit need not be proved. State v. Williams, 179 Wis. 2d 80, 505 N.W.2d 468 (Ct. App. 1993). Sub. (3m) and related rules require medical assistance providers to refund only the amount paid by the medical assistance program on behalf of retroactively eligible persons. A private pay patient subsequently found retroactively eligible does not have a federally protected right to reimbursement from a medical assistance provider for the amount originally paid by the patient in excess of the medical assistance reimbursement. Keup v. DHFS, 2004 WI 16, 269 Wis. 2d 59, 675 N.W.2d 755, 02-0456. The State had a constitutional right to a jury trial on its claim under sub. (4m). State v. Abbott Laboratories, 2012 WI 62, 341 Wis. 2d 510, 816 N.W.2d 145, 10-0232. When the defendant hospital did not send bills directly to Medical Assistance patients, but rather filed liens against the patients' potential settlements with a tortfeasor's insurer, the liens did not constitute "direct charges upon" the patients and were therefore permissible under the plain language of the second prohibition in sub. (3m) (a). Gister v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co. 2012 WI 86, 342 Wis. 2d 496, 818 N.W.2d 880, 09-2795. Sub. (6) permits recovery of attorney fees for private counsel hired by the state. State v. Abbott Laboratories, 2013 WI App 31, 346 Wis. 2d 565, 829 N.W.2d 753, 10-0232. Sub. (4m) (a) 2. unambiguously applies to the amount of payment as well as the right to be paid. State v. Abbott Laboratories, 2013 WI App 31, 346 Wis. 2d 565, 829 N.W.2d 753, 10-0232. Nursing home guarantor agreements may violate sub. (4) after a resident becomes certified Medicaid eligible. 76 Atty. Gen. 295.