Section 7409 - National primary and secondary ambient air quality standards

26 Citing briefs

  1. Sierra Club v. Mccarthy

    MOTION for Summary Judgment

    Filed November 14, 2016

    42 U.S.C. § 7409(a). The Act also requires EPA to review and revise as appropriate the NAAQS every five years, 42 U.S.C. § 7409(d)(1). Because EPA consistently misses Congressionally mandated deadlines, including the deadline to review and revise the NAAQS every five years, there is a 1997 ozone NAAQS and then the next ozone NAAQS is the 2008 ozone NAAQS, some 11 years, rather than five years, later.

  2. Sierra Club et al v. McCarthy

    MOTION for Summary Judgment

    Filed January 16, 2015

    42 U.S.C. § 7409(a). The Act also requires EPA to review and revise, as appropriate, the NAAQS every five years. 42 U.S.C. § 7409(d)(1). Because EPA consistently misses Congressionally mandated deadlines, including the deadline to review and revise the NAAQS every five years, there is a 1997 ozone NAAQS and then the next ozone NAAQS is the 2008 ozone NAAQS, some 11 years, rather than five years, later.

  3. Midwest Environmental Defense Center v. Jackson

    REPLY

    Filed February 28, 2012

    (emphasis added). 42 U.S.C. §§ 7409(d)(1), 7410(a)(1), 7407(d)(1)(B)(i), 7607(d)(1)(a). See EPA Memo at 8-9.

  4. United States v. DTE Energy et al

    MOTION for Preliminary Injunction

    Filed August 6, 2010

    Ex. 1, Chinkin Dec. ¶12; 42 U.S.C. § 7409. Increasing the concentration of pollution with unpermitted emissions in areas already found to be out of compliance with federal standards is sufficient to establish irreparable harm.

  5. Nucor Steel-Arkansas et al v. Pruitt

    Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment

    Filed July 10, 2017

    Under Title I of the Act, EPA is charged with promulgating the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (“NAAQS”) for certain air pollutants. 42 U.S.C. § 7409. The Administrator has promulgated NAAQS for various pollutants, including particulate matter.

  6. Upper Missouri Waterkeeper v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al

    Brief/Memorandum in Support re MOTION for Summary Judgment

    Filed December 21, 2016

    v. Costle, 625 F.2d at 1277. This makes sense in that this part of the Clean Water Act, where Congress is directing the agency and the states to determine what a clean and healthy environment is and to provide standards sufficient to protect that clean and healthy environment, operates like the ambient air standards requirements of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7409. The Supreme Court has followed this reasoning in addressing issues under the Clean Air Act that are the same or similar to the ones 8 This is in contrast to other parts of the Clean Water Act where Congress either explicitly directs cost consideration or makes room for it through language, such as “maximum extent practicable” (municipal stormwater permit requirements) § 1342(p)(3)(B) or “best practicable control technology” (specific requirements for particular effluent limit guidelines) §1314(b) or “where attainable” (interim water quality goals pending full elimination of pollutant discharges and full restoration and protection of chemical, physical and biological quality) § 1251(a)(2).

  7. SIERRA CLUB v. COUNTY OF FRESNO (FRIANT RANCH)

    Amicus Curiae Brief of South Coast Air Quality Management District

    Filed April 13, 2015

    ” EPA must then establish “national ambient air quality standards”at levels “requisite to protect public health’’, allowing “an adequate margin ofsafety.” (42 U.S.C. § 7409; CAA § 109.) EPA hasset standards for six identified pollutants: ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide,particulate matter (PM), and lead.

  8. SIERRA CLUB v. COUNTY OF FRESNO (FRIANT RANCH)

    Amicus Curiae Brief of San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

    Filed April 13, 2015

    "Id. Agency (“EPA”) at levels that are “requisite to protect the public health,” 42 U.S.C. § 7409(b)(1), are established as concentrations of ozone or particulate matter and not as tonnages of their precursor pollutants. Attainment of a particular NAAQSoccurs when the concentration of the relevant pollutant remains below set threshold on a consistent basis throughout a particular region.

  9. Sierra Club v. Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company

    REPLY to Response to Motion

    Filed December 20, 2013

    Consistent with that framework, EPA promulgated National Ambient Air Quality Standards (“NAAQS”) under the CAA for six pollutants: ground-level ozone, lead, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter. 42 U.S.C. § 7409; see generally 40 C.F.R. Part 50. Under the CAA, EPA determines whether areas of a state comply with the NAAQS for those pollutants. The CAA then directs the states Case 5:13-cv-00690-D Document 10-1 Filed 09/06/13 Page 8 of 326:13-cv-00356-JHP Document 25 Filed in ED/OK on 12 20/13 Page 29 of 53 4 CHI-1900817 to adopt State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) to achieve and maintain NAAQS. 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a).

  10. United States of America v. Luminant Generation Company LLC et al

    MOTION to Stay

    Filed September 20, 2013

    Nor does EPA make any factual findings in either NOV to support its conclusory assertions that there 22 NAAQS set the overall quality of the air in the environment to protect human health and the environment with a margin of safety. See 42 U.S.C. § 7409(b); Sierra Club v. EPA, 314 F.3d 735, 737 (5th Cir. 2002). NAAQS are translated by States into limitations on individual sources or groups of sources in order to achieve the overall mandated quality of the ambient air.