§

42 U.S.C. § 602

Section 602 - Eligible States; State plan
Section 602 - Eligible States; State plan

4 Citing briefs

  1. In the Matter of Luz Solla, Respondent,v.Elizabeth Berlin, Appellant, et al., Respondents.

    Brief

    Filed January 15, 2015

    71 See Thomasel, 78 N.Y.2d at 570, wherein the Court of Appeals, in a case similar to this one, described the New York State administration of public assistance benefits as "an interconnected and inextricable chain of authority, with ultimate power reposed in the [State Agency]. The [State Agency], under Federal and State law, has the duty to supervise [public assistance programs] and is authorized to sanction local districts for failure to comply with [state agency] rules (42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(3); Social Services Law § 34[3][d]; § 20[3][e])." 72 New York Social Services Law § 22[9](a); see, 18 N.Y.C.R.R. §§358-4.4, 358-6.1(a) and (b), and 358-6.4.

  2. United States of America, ex rel, et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 245 MOTION to Compel United States, and the States of California, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Washington, and Wisconsin to Produce . . Document

    Filed September 10, 2014

    8 Pursuant to the Social Security Act, each State is required to establish a “single state agency” to administer Medicaid within the State. See Almenares v. Wyman, 334 F. Supp. 512, 517 (S.D.N.Y. 1971) (citing 42 U.S.C. §§ 602(a)(3), 1382(a)(3) (1970)). 9 See, e.g., Dkt.

  3. In the Matter of Walter E. Carver, Respondent,v.State of New York, et al., Appellants.

    Brief

    Filed September 16, 2015

    ... 12 29 U.S.C. § 203 [l] ................................................................................................. 40 29 U.S.C. § 206 ................................................................................................. 8, 12 29 U.S.C. § 212 ..................................................................................................... 40 29 U.S.C. § 216 ..................................................................................................... 40 29 U.S.C. § 217 ..................................................................................................... 40 29 U.S.C. § 213 [a] ................................................................................................ 12 29 U.S.C. § 213 [d] ................................................................................................ 12 42 USC § 601 .......................................................................................................... 5 42 USC § 602(a) ...................................................................................................... 5 42 USC § 607 .......................................................................................................... 5 42 U.S.C. § 608 [c], [d] .................................................................................... 28, 29 42 U.S.C. § 1383 [g] [3] .........................................................................................37 FEDERAL RULES and REGULATIONS 29 C.F.R. § 510-80, 775-94 .....................................................................................22 29 C.F.R. § 553.101 [a] ............................................................................................32 STATE STATUTES Soc. Serv. Law § § 61-62 ........................................................................................... 5 viii Soc. Serv. Law § 104 ..................................................................................

  4. In the Matter of Walter E. Carver, Respondent,v.State of New York, et al., Appellants.

    Brief

    Filed September 16, 2015

    The PRWORA requires States to submit proposed work activities, including the parameters for any work-experience program, to the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for approval. See 42 U.S.C. § 602(a)(1)(A); see also id. § 616 (HHS designated as agency to administer the PRWORA); SSL § 333.