ted States, 287 U.S. 12 (1932) ................................................................................................................................ 7 Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414 (1944) ....................................................................................................................... 7, 12 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 841 (1976) .................................................................................................................................. 3, 4 21 U.S.C. § 321(rr) ........................................................................................................................................ 2, 3 21 U.S.C. § 387 ........................................................................................................................................... passim 21 U.S.C. § 801 ................................................................................................................................................... 4 42 U.S.C. § 16901 ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Pub. L. No. 111-31 § 3(2) ................................................................................................................................. 6 Case 1:19-cv-00531-LG-JCG Document 36 Filed 11/27/19 Page 4 of 24 iv Rules Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)...................................................................................................... 14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1)............................................................................................... 14, 18 Case 1:19-cv-00531-LG-JCG Document 36 Filed 11/27/19 Page 5 of 24 1 The Supreme Court “has over and over upheld even very broad delegations.” Gundy v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 2116, 2129 (2019) (plurality opinion).

’” May, 2007 WL 2790388, at *5 (quoting Mistretta, 488 U.S. at 371). “With respect to SORNA, Congress clearly set forth its purpose in 42 U.S.C. § 16901, namely to establish a comprehensive national registry of sex offenders for the protection of the public.” Howell, 2008 WL 313200, at *7.