1 Citing brief
Image Processing Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
RESPONSE in Opposition re SEALED PATENT MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment of IPR Estoppel - Samsung's Opposition to Plaintiff Image Processing Technologie, LLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of IPR Estoppel
Filed September 22, 2017
passim 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) ...................................................................................................................3, 5 35 U.S.C. § 318(a) ................................................................................................................. passim 35 U.S.C. § 325(e) ...........................................................................................................................6 Other Authorities 37 C.F.R. § 42.80 .............................................................................................................................4 Fed. R. Civ. P 11(b)(2).....................................................................................................................2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) ........................................................................................................................3 Case 2:16-cv-00505-JRG Document 222 Filed 09/22/17 Page 3 of 13 PageID #: 7720 1 I. INTRODUCTION Putting the proverbial cart before the horse, IPT’s motion focuses almost exclusively on the scope of IPR estoppel and all but ignores the threshold question of whether estoppel even applies.