Section 1319 - Enforcement

20 Citing briefs

  1. Idaho Conservation League et al v. Atlanta Gold Corporation

    MEMORANDUM DECISION on Plaintiffs' Motion for Remedies. Granting 60 MOTION for Relief

    Filed July 19, 2012

    This figure represents the minimum penalty that the Court will impose in this case. It also represents less than three percent of the total amount authorized under 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319(d), which as of May 31, 2012, was $75,150,500. Additional penalties may be warranted, or not, depending on the level of expense that AGC will incur in connection with addressing contamination at the 900 Adit site during the MEMORANDUM DECISION ON PLAINTIFFSโ€™ MOTION FOR REMEDIES 41 Case 1:11-cv-00161-MHW Document 87 Filed 07/19/12 Page 41 of 46 ninety-day period granted for compliance with the injunction.

  2. Deschutes River Alliance v. Portland General Electric Company

    Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Fed.R. Civ. P. 12

    Filed September 30, 2016

    And subsection 309(c) provides criminal penalties for violations of section 1311, 1312, 1316, 1317, 1318, 1321(b)(3), 1328, or 1345 of this title [the CWA], or any permit condition or limitation implementing any of such sections in a permit issued under section 1342 [an NPDES permit] . . . or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under section 1342(a)(3) or 1342(b)(8) of this title or in a permit issued under section 1344 of this title by the Secretary of the Army or by a State. 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319(c)(1)(A). Notably omitted from these subsections is any reference to CWA section 401 (33 U.S.C. ยง 1341), much less a reference to section 401 certification conditions.

  3. In re: Triton Asset Leasing GmbH et al

    MEMORANDUM of the United States, Appearing Specially and Not Generally, in Support of Opposed Motion to Lift or Modify the Court's Amended Monition as to Certain Claims and Causes of Action re: [88] MOTION to Lift Stay

    Filed June 1, 2010

    As in the Ohio Valley case, supra, it follows that the Limitation Act is inapplicable to such claims. The following civil penalty regimes, while not an exclusive list, are subject to OPAโ€™s express statutory exclusion of the Limitation Act as applied to fines, penalties, and other relief: the CWA, 33 U.S.C. ยงยง 1319(d), 1321(b)(7); the NMSA, 16 U.S.C. ยง 1437(c) (civil penalties up to $100,000 for each violation, with each day of a continuing violation constituting a separate violation); Marine Mammal Protection Act (โ€œMMPAโ€), 16 U.S.C. ยง 1375(a)(1) (civil penalty of not more than $10,000 for each such violation); Endangered Species Act (โ€œESAโ€), 16 U.S.C. ยง 1540 (a) (civil penalty of $25,000 for each violation); 46 U.S.C. ยง 2302(a) (civil penalty for negligent operations and interfering with safe operation of a vessel); Ports and Waterways Safety Act (โ€œPWSAโ€), 33 U.S.C. ยง 1236 (civil penalty for violations of regulations); the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships ("APPS"), 33 U.S.C. ยง 1908 (civil penalty for violations of MARPOL); the Clean Air Act (โ€œCAAโ€), 42 U.S.C. ยง 7413(b) (civil penalties up to $25,000 for each violation); the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (โ€œRCRAโ€), 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 6928, 6978 (civil penalties); and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (โ€œOCSLAโ€), 43 U.S.C. ยง 1430(b) (civil p

  4. Mingo Logan Coal Company, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

    RESPONSE re MOTION for Summary Judgment Reply Statement of Points and Authorities in Support of Mingo Logan's Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to EPA's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Filed September 7, 2011

    at 22-23, but it neglects to mention that its authority is limited to ยง 404 permits issued โ€œby a State.โ€ 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319(a)(3). In 1977, Congress enacted ยง 404(s) to give the Corps authority for enforcement against violators of ยง 404 permits issued by the Corps and amended ยง 309 to give EPA enforcement authority over ยง 404 permits issued by a State.

  5. USA v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

    MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State an Offense: Counts 2-28

    Filed September 7, 2015

    TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE AN OFFENSE: COUNTS 2-28 Case No. CR-14-00175-TEH 30 U.S.C. ยง 1253(a) .................................................................................................................... 11 30 U.S.C. ยง 1268(e) .................................................................................................................... 11 30 U.S.C. ยง 1271(b) .................................................................................................................... 11 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319(c)(1)(A) .......................................................................................................... 12 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319(c)(2)(A) .......................................................................................................... 12 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319(c)(3)(A) .......................................................................................................... 12 33 U.S.C. ยง 1342(b) .................................................................................................................... 12 33 U.S.C. ยง 1342(i) ..................................................................................................................... 12 42 U.S.C. ยง 6926(b) .................................................................................................................... 12 42 U.S.C. ยง 6928(d)(4) ............................................................................................................... 12 42 U.S.C. ยง 6928(d)(5) ............................................................................................................... 12 42 U.S.C. ยง 7410(a) .................................................................................................................... 11 42 U.S.C. ยง 7410(c) .........................

  6. Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

    MOTION for Summary Judgment on Claims I and II

    Filed August 2, 2012

    at 550-51.23 22 Section 1319(g)(1) is a parallel to the citizen-suit provision that authorizes EPA to sue for violations of specifically enumerated provisions of the CWA, including, among others, Sections 1311(a) and 1342. 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319(g)(1). 23 As the court in Service Oil explained, by its express terms, Section 1311(a) only prohibits the โ€œdischargeโ€ of pollutants, except in compliance with other specified provisions of the CWA, including Section 1342.

  7. Alaska Community Action On Toxics et al v. Aurora Energy Services, LLC et al

    RESPONSE in Opposition re Joint MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings

    Filed May 24, 2010

    The CWA imposes strict liability for violations of the Act. See 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319(d). In passing the Act, Congress recognized the value of citizens acting as private attorneys general, by allowing citizens to bring citizen suits.

  8. Deschutes River Alliance v. Portland General Electric Company

    Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Oral Argument requested.

    Filed April 27, 2018

    14 DRA has not sought, nor could it seek, civil penalties for the alleged violations. In a citizen suit, the court may โ€œapply any appropriate civil penalties under section 1319(d) of this title [CWA section 309(d), 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319(d)].โ€ 33 U.S.C. ยง 1365(a).

  9. Wendling Quarries v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

    MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction

    Filed October 31, 2016

    The Supreme Courtโ€™s recent decisions in Hawkes, 136 S. Ct. 1807, and Sackett v. EPA, 132 S. Ct. 1367 (2012), do not affect this conclusion. In Sackett, the Court held that a CWA administrative compliance order issued by EPA under 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 was a final agency action reviewable under the APA. Sackett, 132 S. Ct. at 1371-72.

  10. United States v. Range Production Company et al

    MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, For Failure to State a Claim

    Filed March 21, 2011

    "). 'See, e.g., 42 U.S.C. ยงยง 6934, 6973 (RCRA); 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 (Clean Water Act); see also 42 U.S.C. ยง 9606(a) (CERCLA). 12 Case 3:11-cv-00116-F Document 7 Filed 03/21/11 Page 17 of 31 PageID 49 Section 1431 is similar to these other environmental statutes.