Section 1714 - Protection against discrimination based on geographic location

2 Analyses of this statute by attorneys

  1. Spillman v. RPM Pizza, LLC, 2013 WL 2286076 (M.D. La. May 23, 2013)

    McGlinchey Stafford PLLC khigginbothamMay 15, 2014

    Excluding the estimated value of the injunctive relief, the total potential value of the cash and voucher components of the settlement was more than $20,000,000.Because the settlement involved creation of a common fund, the settlement was subject to CAFA, and a CAFA settlement must comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1714 and § 1715. Having preliminarily approved the settlement, the Magistrate Judge issued the class notices and directed the parties to comply CAFA notice requirements.

  2. Rollo and Crowson publish article: “Mapping the New Class Action Frontier – A Primer On The Class Action Fairness Act, and Amended Federal Rule 23.”

    McGlinchey Stafford PLLCMcGlinchey StaffordSeptember 5, 2005

    Id. (codified as 28 U.S.C. § 1714). 62. Id.