§

28 U.S.C. § 46

Section 46 - Assignment of judges; panels; hearings; quorum
Section 46 - Assignment of judges; panels; hearings; quorum

24 Citing briefs

  1. Almerfedi et al v. Bush et al

    REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The “decision of a division” is “the decision of the court.” Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile Case 1:05-cv-01645-UNA Document 36 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 6 of 16 -3- Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 975 F.2d 871, 876 (D.C.Cir.1992) (in banc), cert.

  2. DHIAB et al v. BUSH et al

    REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The “decision of a division” is “the decision of the court.” Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile Case 1:05-cv-01457-UNA Document 23 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 6 of 16 -3- Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 975 F.2d 871, 876 (D.C.Cir.1992) (in banc), cert.

  3. Jabbarov et al vs. Bush et al

    Memorandum in opposition to re 369 MOTION to Stay

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The "decision of a division" is "the decision of the court." Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile -2- Case 1:05-cv-02386-UNA Document 372 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 6 of 16 Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatoly Comm’n, 975 F.2d 871,876 (D.C.Cir. 1992) (in banc), cert.

  4. HATIM et al v. BUSH et al

    REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The “decision of a division” is “the decision of the court.” Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile Case 1:05-cv-01429-UNA Document 78 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 6 of 16 -3- Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 975 F.2d 871, 876 (D.C.Cir.1992) (in banc), cert.

  5. BACHA et al v. BUSH et al

    REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The “decision of a division” is “the decision of the court.” Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 975 F.2d 871, 876 (D.C.Cir.1992) (in banc), cert.

  6. Al-Zarnouqi et al v. Bush et al

    REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The "decision of a division" is "the decision of the court." Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile -2- Case 1:06-cv-01767-UNA Document 40 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 6 of 16 Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatoly Comm’n, 975 F.2d 871,876 (D.C.Cir. 1992) (in banc), cert.

  7. Jabbarov et al vs. Bush et al

    REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The "decision of a division" is "the decision of the court." Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile -2- Case 1:05-cv-02386-UNA Document 371 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 6 of 16 Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatoly Comm’n, 975 F.2d 871,876 (D.C.Cir. 1992) (in banc), cert.

  8. Mousovi et al v. Bush et al

    REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The “decision of a division” is “the decision of the court.” Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 975 F.2d 871, 876 (D.C.Cir.1992) (in banc), cert.

  9. SAMEUR v. BUSH et al

    REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The “decision of a division” is “the decision of the court.” Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile Case 1:05-cv-01806-CKK Document 47 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 6 of 16 -3- Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 975 F.2d 871, 876 (D.C.Cir.1992) (in banc), cert.

  10. Rabbani et al v. Bush et al

    REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed May 14, 2007

    The “decision of a division” is “the decision of the court.” Revision Notes to 28 U.S.C. § 46 (citing Textile Case 1:05-cv-01607-UNA Document 40 Filed 05/14/2007 Page 6 of 16 -3- Mills Sec. Corp. v. Commissioner, 314 U.S. 326 (1941)); see Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 975 F.2d 871, 876 (D.C.Cir.1992) (in banc), cert.