§
Rule 34 - Oral Argument

6 Citing briefs

  1. PEOPLE v. SIVONGXXAY (VAENE) (To be called and continued to the December 2016 calendar.)

    Appellant’s Reply Brief

    Filed December 31, 2013

    * Submitted June 3, 1997 7N” FN** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral ar- gument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4. Decided June 9, 1997.

  2. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Bronsberg & Hughes Pontiac, Inc.

    REPLY BRIEF re MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Wyoming Valley's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss or Stay Pending Adjudication of State Action

    Filed April 27, 2017

    ` The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for 1 Cases that cite this headnotedecision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2)~~)• ~ *537 Appeal from the. United States District Court for the Decided Jan. 8, 2004.

  3. Shaya Baird v. Sabre Inc et al

    MEMORANDUM from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

    Filed February 3, 2016

    ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Case 2:13-cv-00999-SVW-JPR Document 59 Filed 02/03/16 Page 1 of 4 Page ID #:1200 Protection Act (“TCPA”).

  4. Donelson v. Devon Energy Production Company, L.P. et al

    MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint

    Filed October 3, 2014

    4 Case 4:14-cv-00316-JHP-FHM Document 124 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/03/14 Page 30 of 31 Jech v. Department of Interior, 483 Fed.Appx. 555 (2012) * I 2 3 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties' request for a decision on the briefs wi~out oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.l(G).

  5. In Re: USA Commercial Mortgage Company

    MEMORANDUM/OPINION of USCA, Ninth Circuit, as to 1558 Notice of Appeal

    Filed September 28, 2011

    BK-S-09-32824-RCJ Case: 09-16897 09/19/2011 ID: 7898670 DktEntry: 88-1 Page: 4 of 21Case 2:07-cv-00892-RCJ -GWF Document 2238 Filed 09/28/11 Page 4 of 21 **The panel unanimously concludes this matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ***The Honorable Richard Mills, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

  6. Northon et al v. Rule et al

    Memorandum from the USCA relating to the Notice of Appeal 32 .

    Filed December 14, 2009

    The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without ** oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). GT/Research NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LIYSA NORTHON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ANN RULE, an individual; et al., Defendants - Appellees. No. 07-35319 D.C. No. CV-06-00851-MO MEMORANDUM * Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 17, 2009** Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. Liysa Northon appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting defendants’ special motion to strike under Oregon’s anti-SLAPP statute, Or. Rev. FILED DEC 14 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS Case: 07-35319 12/14/2009 Page: 1 of 3 ID: 7162653 DktEntry: 67-1 Case 3:06-cv-00851-MO Document 44 Filed 12/14/09 Page 1 of 3 Page ID#: 219 GT/Research 07-353192 Stat. § 31.150. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Gardner v. Martino, 563