3 Citing briefs
Cintron-Acevedo v. Department of Health Human Services
MOTION for Summary Judgment
Filed April 28, 2017
The ALJ also correctly determined that Cintron’s criminal conduct, which resulted in his felony conviction, occurred after August 21, 1996. Id.; see also, 18 U.S.C. § 3559 (reflecting that Petitioner’s offense is classified as a Class E felony because the maximum imprisonment term is less than five years, but more than one year). The ALJ also correctly found that Cintron’s criminal offense involved fraud and was related to or committed in connection with the delivery of a health care item or service.
Podliska v. U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on the Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi et al
MOTION to Dismiss Counts IV and V of the Complaint
Filed February 5, 2016
......14, 17 2 U.S.C. § 4108(a) .....................................................................................................................4 18 U.S.C. § 798 ........................................................................................................................23 18 U.S.C. § 798(a) ...................................................................................................................23 Case 1:15-cv-02037-RDM Document 23 Filed 02/05/16 Page 19 of 69 xvii Statutes and Regulations – continued Page(s) 18 U.S.C. § 1924 ......................................................................................................................23 18 U.S.C. § 1924(a) .................................................................................................................23 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d) ............................................................................................................24 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(6) .............................................................................................................23 Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h) ..........................................................................9 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) ..................................................................................................................2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1)..............................................................................................................7 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)............................................................................................................10 Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(d) ..................................................................................................................3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) ................................................................................................................44 Legislative Authorities H.R. Res. 567, 113th Cong.
Michalowski v. Rutherford et al
REPLY
Filed September 18, 2014
See, e.g., Bautista v. Atty. Gen., 744 F. 3d 54, 61-62 (3d Cir. 2014) (applying Descamps in interpreting the Immigration and Nationality Act provision regarding conviction for crimes involving moral turpitude); United States v. Pascacio- Rodriguez, 749 F.3d 353, 356-59 (5th Cir. 2014) (same; U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2); United States v. Garcia- Santana, 743 F.3d 666, 672 (9th Cir. 2014) (same; 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(U)); United States v. Davila- Felix, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16293, at *5 (1st Cir. Aug. 18, 2014) (same; 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c)(1)). Case: 1:14-cv-00899 Document #: 64 Filed: 09/18/14 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:411 7 ‘for a violent felony,’ including ‘burglary, arson, or extortion.’” Descamps, 133 S. Ct. at 2281 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)) (emphasis added).