Section 1691a - Definitions; rules of construction

14 Citing briefs

  1. Cole et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC

    MEMORANDUM in Support of 8 MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed February 19, 2010

    A creditor is defined as someone who “regularly extends” credit, or an assignee of a creditor that participates in the decision to extend credit. 15 U.S.C. § 1691a(e); see also 12 C.F.R. § 202.2(l) (defining a creditor as “a person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly participates in a credit decision, including setting the terms of the credit”).

  2. American Bar Association v. Federal Trade Commission

    Memorandum in opposition to re MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment

    Filed October 13, 2009

    . “Credit,” in turn, is defined in the ECOA as “the right granted by a creditor to a debtor to defer payment of debt or to incur debts and defer its payment or to purchase property or services and defer payment therefor.” 15 U.S.C. § 1691a(d). The FRB is charged with issuing implementing regulations to carry out the purposes of the ECOA, see 15 U.S.C. § 1691b(a), and has issued the ECOA implementing regulation, referred to as “Regulation B,” under 12 C.F.R. pt. 202.

  3. Gesin v. Equifax Information Services Llc

    Brief/Memorandum in Support

    Filed July 5, 2017

    The ECOA prohibits credit discrimination on various bases, including marital status. See 15 U.S.C. § 1691a. To effect that broad mandate, Congress authorized the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) to promulgate regulations governing the consumer credit market.

  4. Russick v. Wells Fargo, Inc.

    BRIEF in Support re Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

    Filed April 7, 2017

    See 15 U.S.C. § 15 U.S.C. § 1691a(b). Accordingly, Ms. Russick cannot establish an ECOA claim against Wells Fargo based upon disability.

  5. Rodriguez v. Experian Information Solutions Inc et al

    MOTION for Summary Judgment

    Filed March 16, 2017

    FACTA incorporates the definition of “credit” 57 from the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”). See 15 U.S.C. § 1691a(d). But that definition does not change the meaning of section 1681a(m), because the term “credit transaction that is not initiated by the consumer” is defined to exclude those situations when collectors of “accounts” access consumer credit reports.

  6. Gesin v. Equifax Information Services Llc

    Brief/Memorandum in Support

    Filed December 30, 2016

    The ECOA prohibits credit discrimination on various bases, including marital status. See 15 U.S.C. § 1691a. To effect that broad mandate, Congress authorized the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) to promulgate regulations governing the consumer credit market.

  7. Adkins et al v. Morgan Stanley et al

    REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed February 20, 2013

    They also agree that for an “assignee” to be a “creditor,” it must actually “participate[] in the decision to extend, renew, or continue credit.” 15 U.S.C. § 1691a(e); see Mem. 17; Opp.

  8. Edward Jackson v. Bank of America

    NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint

    Filed April 5, 2017

    Cashing checks is not protected under the ECOA. (15 U.S.C. § 1691(a); 15 U.S.C. § 1691a(d).) Accordingly, even if true, Plaintiff’s allegation that Bank of America refused to negotiate nearly a billion dollars in bonds in 2003 does not state a claim under the ECOA, because negotiating bonds is not protected under the ECOA.

  9. Edward Jackson v. Bank of America

    NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case

    Filed January 26, 2017

    Cashing checks is not protected under the ECOA. 15 U.S.C. § 1691(a); 15 U.S.C. § 1691a(d). Furthermore, any bank, business, or entity would be well within their legal rights to refuse to cash a check for hundreds of millions of dollars drawn on foreign banks, whose names Plaintiff admits he does not know.

  10. Adkins et al v. Morgan Stanley et al

    MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss

    Filed December 21, 2012

    (1997) .................................................................................................................10 Vaughn v. Consumer Home Mortgage Co., 297 F. App’x 23 (2d Cir. 2008) ...............................................................................................30 Wards Cove Packaging Co. v. Atonio, 490 U.S. 642 (1989) .................................................................................................................26 Williams v. 2000 Homes Inc., 2009 WL 2252528 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) ........................................................................................20 Case 1:12-cv-07667-HB Document 37 Filed 12/21/12 Page 8 of 41 viii Wright v. Castle Point Mortgage, 2006 WL 1468678 (D.N.J. 2006) ............................................................................................16 STATUTES 15 U.S.C. § 1691(a) .......................................................................................................................17 15 U.S.C. § 1691a(e)......................................................................................................................17 15 U.S.C. § 1691e(f) ..............................................................................................................8, 9, 10 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–2(k) .................................................................................................................26 42 U.S.C. § 3605(a) ...........................................................................................................14, 15, 16 42 U.S.C. § 3605(b) .......................................................................................................................14 42 U.S.C. § 3613(a) ...................................................................................................................7, 10 Mich. Comp. Laws § 37.